The following are excerpts from Paul Craig Roberts’ latest column. Some of the videos (especially the second one below) he links to are truly hair-raising:
What follows is not an argument that the report of the Sandy Hook shootings is a hoax. What follows is an argument that suspicions are created when agenda takes precedence over reporting and discrepancies in reports are left unresolved.
Agenda-driven news is the reason that apparent inconsistencies in the Sandy Hook story were not investigated or explained. According to some reports, the medical examiner said the children were shot with a rifle, but other reports say the accused was found dead inside the school with two pistols and that a rifle was found outside in the car. The police capture a man in the woods who says “I didn’t do it.” How would a person in the woods know what has just happened? Who was the man? Was he investigated and released? Will we ever know?
Some reports say the school was locked and admission is via security camera and being buzzed in. Why would a heavily armed person be buzzed in? Other reports say he shot his way in. Why wouldn’t such a commotion have alerted the school?
Another puzzle is the video of a father whose child has supposedly been shot to pieces. Prior to the interview he is caught on camera laughing and joking, and then, like an actor, he pulls his face and voice into a presentation of grief for the interview.
The spokesman for the Connecticut State Police is anxious to control the story, warns social media against posting information contrary to official information, but provides little information, refusing to answer most questions. The usual “ongoing investigation” is invoked, but Lanza has already been declared to be the killer and the number of dead reported. About the only hard information that emerges is that the police are investigating where every component of the weapons was manufactured. The relevance to the shooting of where the components of the weapons were manufactured is not explained. http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/people-spreading-misinformation-sandy-hook-massacre-face-charges-police-article-1.1221554
The medical examiner’s press conference is weird. He is incoherent, unsure of what he is supposed to say, hasn’t answers to questions he should have, and defers to police.
Perhaps the best way to avoid fueling suspicion is for public officials not to hold press conferences until they are prepared to answer the relevant questions.
And where are the bodies? Like the alleged murder of Osama bin Laden by a SEAL, the crucial evidence is not provided. Paul Vance, the Connecticut State Police spokesman, said that the “victims’ bodies were removed from the school overnight” and that detectives “were able to positively identify all of the victims and make some formal notification to all of the families of the victims.” http://www.kens5.com/news/Sandy-Hook-victims-identified-bodies-removed-from-school-overnight-183647091.html?ref=next
Allegedly, no parent wanted to see the body of their dead child, but how do you know it is your child if you do not see the body? It is a strange kind of closure when it is provided to parents by impersonal detectives. Has anyone seen a body other than a state medical examiner and a few detectives? Where are the media’s films of body bags being carried out of the school? Why would Obama’s gun control agenda forego the propaganda of a procession of body bags being carried out of a school?
Perhaps the sensitivity issue prevailed, but with all the suspicion that already exists about the government and its claims, why fuel the suspicion by withholding visual evidence of the tragedy?
There are reports that when emergency medical help arrived at the school, the medical personnel were denied access to the children on the grounds that there were no survivors and the scene was too gruesome. Yet, there is a conflicting story that one six-year old girl had the presence of mind to play dead and walked out of her classroom unscathed. If the story is true, how do we know that other survivors did not bleed to death from wounds because the emergency medical personnel were denied access? Did police exercise more control over the scene than was warranted? http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/news/regions/americas/united-states/121216/sandy-hook-shooting-girl-6-was-sole-survivor-her
It doesn’t seem to matter that questions are not answered and discrepancies are not resolved. http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-sandy-hook-school-massacre-unanswered-questions-and-missing-information/5316776 The story is useful to the gun control agenda. Progressives, in order to achieve their agenda, are willing adjuncts of the police state. The facts of the shooting are less important than the use of the incident to achieve their agenda.
Probably there are answers to the questions. Moreover, the news reports that are the basis for questions could be incorrect. But why aren’t the answers provided and confusions cleared up? Instead, people who ask obvious questions are dismissed as “insensitive to the tragedy” or as “conspiracy kooks.” This in itself deepens suspicion.
The Colorado movie theater shooting has its own unresolved discrepancies. One eyewitness claimed that there were two shooters. Apparently, the suspect was captured sitting in a car in the theater parking lot, which seems strange. There are claims that the accused, a graduate student in neuroscience, was involved with the Defense Advance Research Projects Agency in mind control research and that he doesn’t remember doing the shooting.
Do we actually know? Apparently not. Wouldn’t it be preferable to investigate these claims rather than to leave them as unanswered sources of suspicion? The loose ends of the Colorado movie shooting contribute to the suspicions caused by news reports of the Sandy Hook shootings.
A shooting incident occurs. The government puts out a story. Agendas form and take the place of the story. Unresolved issues disappear in heated dispute over agendas. Gun control advocates blame guns, and Second Amendment defenders blame other factors.
When the media permit agenda to take precedence over news, people lose confidence in the media and distrust spreads deeper into society. If the media and the government are opposed to conspiracy theories, they should not foster the theories by mishandling the news.
Neither the right-wing nor the left-wing has an interest in getting to the bottom of things. The right-wing is aligned with the police state in order to make us safe from “terrorism”– Muslim terrorism, not the terrorism of the unaccountable police state.
The American left is so feeble that it essentially doesn’t exist. Its issues are gun control, homosexual marriage, abortion, and taxing “the rich.” Such misfocus cannot slow the onrushing militarized police state. American liberals have such an abiding faith in government that they are incapable of believing that beloved government would be culpable in crimes–unless, of course, it was Ronald Reagan’s government.
As tyranny envelops the land, the main goal of the left-wing is to disarm the population.
The American left is the enabler of the police state, and the American right is its progenitor.
Americans began their descent into deception and tyranny in the final years of the 20th century with the Clinton regime’s aggression against Serbia and murderous sanctions on Iraq. These war crimes were portrayed by the US media and foreign policy community as great achievements of Western democracy and humanitarianism.
In the first decade of the 21st century Americans lost their constitutional protections and had their pocketbooks opened to indefinite wars. The latest report is that Washington is sending US troops into 35 African countries. http://rt.com/usa/news/us-deploying-troops-order-749/print/
Worse is to come.
Interesting article naturally all the linked videos are now banned by the youtube thought control police. Small correction Americas descent into tyranny started with Abraham Lincoln’s illegal war against peaceful southern states followed by Woodrow Wilson’s WW1 disaster. And here we are.
In demonstration of its eternal strength and rightness, the Ministry of Truth today has created an exact replica Sandy Hook Elementary down to the last detail “For the Children”…
“Every class is pretty much meticulously rendered to look exactly like when the kids left it, right down to the water bottles on the desk,” Selectman Steve Vavrek says. “Everything that that child left — and remember, they left without their coats, their backpacks, their water bottles, anything.”
Vavrek says the walls are now painted the colors of Sandy Hook’s. All the same posters, artwork, smart boards, even cubby holes are going into the classrooms, too.
“Right down to the sign they’re going to see outside is their sign. I guess, for their sake, they’ve been through enough,” he says. “A couple of kids are apprehensive, but as soon as they walk around the school, the first thing they say is, ‘Wow, our gym is bigger,’ or ‘Wow, our cafeteria’s now bigger’ … It’s ‘our,’ they’re already saying ‘our.’ That shows the resilience of kids because … they already know it’s theirs.”
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2250779/Sandy-Hook-shooting-Survivors-attend-nearby-Chalk-Hill-school.html
http://www.npr.org/2012/12/22/167883378/near-replica-of-sandy-hook-made-nearby-for-students
Classes will resume Thursday, January 3rd, 2013.
Sandy Hook Teachers proclaim: ‘This Allows Us to Stay Together.’ Officials proclaim: Chalk Hill Will Be Safe For Sandy Hook Students
Note how many such incidents or close calls (such as the attempt to shoot up an Oregon shopping mall just before Newtown, thwarted by a citizen with a legal concealed weapon) we’ve had this year, especially since Obama’s reelection. Note also how many of these gunmen have conveniently offed themselves as Adam Lanza allegedly did. I don’t think any of it’s coincidence.
A relative thinks that these are false flag operations meant to justify a gun grab and overall tightening of federal rules. He also thinks that the Oregon mall incident just a few days before was intended to be much worse, but the citizen stopping it led to the Newtown shooting being staged much sooner than planned.
No one is asking how a messed-up, geeky, autistic 20–year-old was able to pull off these shootings and then conveniently off himself. Perhaps killing Lanza and making it look like suicide was the role of the guy in camo found in the woods? Did he have a federal law enforcement ID of some sort that led to his release after the cops detained him?
If you think these disturbing videos are bad, you should see the one that has surfaced of the President with a group of children, one of whom looks exactly like one of the shooting victims and even wearing the same coat as in her studio picture. Creepy. Other videos have surfaced of allegedly grieving parents and familiy members who look more as if they’re acting for the camera. Sobbing but no tears, and so forth. Give those people an Academy Award!
We’ve only scratched the surface. What provides some small comfort is that even people who don’t normally think of the government in this light are questioning what they’re seeing and hearing (or not hearing) and the facts of the Newtown school shooting.
The players are not seen again when they exit from the stage.
These are interesting questions raised concerning the events at Sandy Hook. I (We) may never know the answers.
It reminds me of history class discussing the use of misinformation during wartime. I do not know who is being misled or why.
The two videos of that guy are extremely disturbing. How the hell can he be laughing and joking then fall right into character on queue? I’ve see this EXACT behavior demonstrated by professional actors/wrestlers at a WWE event I worked. 3,2,1 action..
“Alex Jones and infowars.com posted a second petition on the White House website. It calls for the federal government – including the Secret Service and the Pentagon – to disarm under the mandate of the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990.”