The billions in fines paid by Volkswagen AG and criminal indictment of seven of the company’s executives are a “very strong deterrent” to cheating by other automakers, a senior career EPA official said on Wednesday.
Christopher Grundler, director of the EPA’s Office of Transportation and Air Quality, told reporters after remarks at a meeting of automotive engineers in Washington that the penalties have had a big impact.
“It gets everybody’s attention,” he said.
Asked if the EPA under President Donald Trump could reverse the Obama administration’s decision to finalize the 2022-25 vehicle greenhouse gas emissions limits in its final days, Grundler noted that EPA nominee Scott Pruitt told a Senate panel earlier this month he would review the decision.
“We will be prepared to brief him and his team on the work we did,” Grundler said, noting that a new EPA administrator can revisit a regulation but must follow the same process.
VW earlier this month agreed to plead guilty and pay $4.3 billion in U.S. civil and criminal fines to resolve its diesel emissions scandal. In total, VW has now agreed to spend up to $22 billion in the United States to address claims from owners, environmental regulators, states and dealers.
VW admitted in September 2015 to installing secret software in hundreds of thousands of U.S. diesel cars to cheat exhaust emissions tests and make them appear cleaner than they were on the road, and that as many as 11 million vehicles could have similar software installed worldwide.
Grundler said aggressive enforcement is key to automakers complying with emissions rules.
“Without a broad expectation of accountability, we know the inevitable result will be a race to the bottom — to whatever level is the lack of EPA oversight will allow,” Grundler said in his remarks.
“We aim with our enforcement to make sure the cost of non-compliance is always much higher than the cost of complying with our laws.”
One lesson the EPA learned from Volkswagen is “we need to avoid being too predictable in our compliance oversight,” he said.
The EPA launched a new round of real-world compliance testing in September 2015 after VW, which prompted its findings that Fiat Chrysler Automobiles NV were illegally using hidden software to allow excess diesel emissions to go undetected.
Fiat Chrysler has denied wrongdoing.
Grundler said the EPA plans to post publicly more non-business confidential information on vehicle testing, including emissions recalls and defect reports to boost transparency.
He added that the EPA wants vehicles to perform the same in the laboratory as on the road. “We want to discourage manufacturers from simply designing to the tests,” Grundler said.
If you like what you’ve found here, please consider supporting EPautos.
We depend on you to keep the wheels turning! Especially this month; we’re low – see the pie chart on the main page.
Our donate button is here.
If you prefer not to use PayPal, our mailing address is:
EPautos
721 Hummingbird Lane SE
Copper Hill, VA 24079
PS: EPautos magnets are free to those who send in $20 or more to support the site. Please bear with as I have had to order a new batch; they should be here – and in the mail – within a couple weeks. 
“EPA Thug”! I love it. This is the kind of language we who love Liberty should be using all the time. The busybodies, especially from the left, are masters of using language to sublimely influence thinking and attitudes. We must do the same and beat them at their own game.
No government “official” should be shown any respect and ridiculing language is a solid way to undercut their “authoritah!”. Another good example is Eric’s use of the word “fatwa”. It expresses how the maniacal asshats are members of the most dangerous religion ever known – the Cult Of Government (COG).
Fill-in-the-blank for any government agency or agent should always be followed by “Thug” or “Zealot” or “Cartel” or “Narcissist” or “Grifter” or “Goon” etc.
I’m going balls deep, Skunk!
That’s an image I didn’t want in my brain. Haha
Lets say you get to meet with Trump. He agrees with most of what you say (likely), and he says, Eric, I got a job with (whatever agency) for you. You think you would take it, to see if you could make an effective change?
Eric, yep. For those of us who still have balls it is the only way we can go now.
The takeaway from this is NEVER cooperate when you are dealing with the state. VW should have fought this, gone the mattresses, it would probably not have cost a $1 billion in legal fees – a relative pittance.
The defense is simple – the cars are designed to optimize performance, mileage and emissions for the conditions the care find themselves in. Testing is a synthetic environment anyway, the cars are tuned for the best combination and emission testing is but one.
I hope other companies learned that lesson. Never surrender.
He added that the EPA wants vehicles to perform the same in the laboratory as on the road. “We want to discourage manufacturers from simply designing to the tests,” Grundler said.
What would they expect? Even in schools (many) students learn what is needed to pass the test.
Often heard in the classroom: “Will this be on the test?” If it is not on the test, many do not bother to learn the material.
Time will show how FiatChrysler fares against the EPA. The company might as well go down swinging considering what happened to VW.