“General Welfare” and “Climate Change”

“Charge rage”. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12585467/Furious-EV-owners-resort-getting-middle-night-charge-cars-fights-break-charging-points-arent-marshals-brought-police-service-stations.html

When you are born you have the right to a share of the resources on the planet to survive….God created and owns the planet and everything on it, he provided enough resources for you to thrive…..you were put here to enjoy…not be a slave……

As soon as you are born you are signed off to the slave market…

Through trickery on how your birth certificate is constructed….. so you are made a slave and the property of the slave owners…the control group….

When you are born you have the right to a share of the resources on the planet to survive…a trust is opened in your name, which could be worth a million dollars, or far more…..through trickery on your birth certificate, the control of this trust is given to the control group….you can’t access it or control it….when you die the control group gets to keep your money….

…. the control of this trust is given to the control group…they use this as collateral to finance their agenda…..

Getting back control of your trust fund is possible…..

Birthing certificates

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s2R-ussdTLE

FOREIGN-MILITARY-OCCUPATION

Who owns the country?…….bat germ (mild flu) lockdowns…why?

https://rumble.com/vnw7q6-foreign-military-occupation.html

Two ev articles of interest

https://www.thesun.co.uk/motors/24205914/money-expert-evs-arent-future/

https://www.thesun.co.uk/motors/24219711/we-ditched-petrol-now-punished/ On insurance cancellation in uk market of ev

I-I-It’s for the greater good …

https://www.tiktok.com/@not_for_u_2/video/7273329120011128110

One of my favorite quotes is simple but brutally true:

“The greater good has always been the alibi of tyrants.”

Even if the CONstitution somehow did limit Fedgov what difference would it make? All the prez has to do is declare an “Emergency” and rule by diktat, guaranteed to be the future for us here in the USSA.

Folks, it’s all well and good to examine the “weasel words” used by FedGov and those that (1) don’t think it’s big ENOUGH (2) want Federal funds for THEIR pet projects or (3) want to use the bully pulpit of the Executive Branch to enforce THEIR desires, sans restraint.

Judging by how the Second Amendment is still “infringed” to a degree that likely the Founders would find offensive, and wonder why the hell we don’t rise up in revolt, I’d say that what’s written in the Constitution is meaningless. As the 43rd POTUS, whom Eric refers to as “The Chimp”, once labeled it, to those power-mad in the District of Criminals, it’s but a SCRAP OF PAPER.

DECEIVED-INTO-CONSENT

JUSTINIAN DECEPTION | ROMLEY STEWART
The legal systems, Courts, Governments… are ALL FRAUDULENT!
FRAUD negates all contracts! This goes for banking too!

The entire world has been defrauded!

Everyone needs to listen to what Romley has to say!

https://rumble.com/v248546-deceived-into-consent.html

Breaking News: RFK Jr. Flees Democrat Plantation, Set to Run as Independent

The New York Times reported last week that he met with the chair of the Libertarian Party, raising the prospect of a departure from the party that decades ago became synonymous with his family name.

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2023-09-29/breaking-news-rfk-jr-flees-democrat-plantation-set-run-independent

General Welfare lives across the hall from General Nuisance at the Pentagon.

General Disarray is a couple floors down.

The meaning of general welfare at the time was the opposite of specific welfare – or today, special interest. So, taxing was only to be for laws that benefitted everyone.

General welfare itself is not a specific grant of power, just a limitation.

This really all changed due to Lincoln’s war. When the south lost, it set the precedent that the states were subservient to the general government.

From that we have many things:
West Virginia somehow became a state
States (ignoring the 10th amendment) can’t secede.
Presidents can use military force against states (constitutional definition of treason)
American Imperialism started taking steroids and led to our taking part in WWI & II and the financial systems of the world
Combined with the fear and complacency during the great depression, gave Hoover & FDR the room to create the modern fascist American state

Thomas Jefferson died on July 4, 1826, had accrued a debt of 107,000 dollars. The farm got sold, Monticello sold for 7000 dollars, everything was gone, the slaves were sold at auction. Monticello was in disrepair.

The scrivener of the Declaration of Independence was in rough shape financially, had to have an effect on Tom’s psyche.

The US gov should have bailed Jefferson out of his predicament. Pay him for the document by word and punctuation.

Jefferson can receive reparations from the US Gov. Tax Bill Gates, Albert Bourla, Joe Biden, Nancy Pelosi, Klaus the Slob, Putin can pay his fair share too. In fact, all of them can write a check for all of the money they have.

Has to total more than a trillion to get any redemption, Jefferson is worth a trillion times more than any of those knuckleheads combined.

Trump has been picked on and berated and belittled since the day he was sworn into office.

An obvious indoctrination by the opponents, Deep State Inc is the Vampire Squid, Engulf and Devour Inc. has controlling interest and more than 51 percent of the shares.

If you are disgusted and dissatisfied with the way things are, you have a lot of company.

Still a good time to be alive, however, I wouldn’t want to be any part of that motley WEF crew.

Agony, misery, pain, beatings constantly, your morale should improve over time.

If anybody deserves all of the money on earth, Jefferson gets it first.

Raze the Lincoln Memorial and get rid of the bum.

Consider this famous quote from Madison in 1788: “If men were angels, no government would be necessary. If angels were to govern men, neither external nor internal controls on government would be necessary. In framing a government which is to be administered by men over men, the great difficulty lies in this: you must first enable the government to control the governed; and in the next place oblige it to control itself.”

Madison was no dummy. And here he admits the need for a govt to make laws and enforce them to control the common everyday bad guys. But he’s also concerned with — my implication — the need for a govt to control govt (laws enforcers enabled to control the bad guys in govt). Alas, he knew right then and there that the founders were up against an impossible endeavor. How do you get the police to police the police? Or maybe you can have police that police the police, and then have another layer of police to police those police, and so on). I think he knew, as did most of the founders, that their job was one of futility and the best they could hope for was to compose a document that would provide at least temporary relief from govt tyranny.

But why was this so? Why can’t men behave like angels, and why can’t they just do the right thing? The answer of course is human nature. Yes I know, you can try to overcome this deficiency by making all the laws you want in order to limit bad behavior (and just exactly what is the definition of bad behavior?). And yes you can have codes of conduct based on religion or some other philosophy. But none of that is going to make angels out of men (for those who object to my use of the term “men”, please proceed immediately to the democrat party for assistance & directions to the nearest Safe House).

So the next question to ask is what is it about human nature that makes it so destructive? Obviously there’s a lot to point a finger at but I think one of the worst human traits has to be dat ole debil, laziness.

Since one must acquire things in order to maintain your existence, you have to come up with ways to get those things. Most people use to actually work to accomplish this. But today that’s old fashioned, difficult, time consuming, and completely inconvenient. How terrible. And this is why almost everyone today gravitates towards govt in order to get the things they need. That’s the lazy man’s preferred method, and maybe even the lazy man’s way to riches.

Aaron Clarey AKA: Capt Capitalism put out a pretty good video on the subject of laziness with this one:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2tY2U93zSkA&t=4s

The year in American history that was the primary cause of all the crap we endure today is 1913. Three important events that were poison pills were the ratification of the 16th Amendment (federal tax on incomes), 17th Amendment (popular election of senators that killed off state government representation in DC) and the creation of the “Federal” Reserve that allowed private banks to take control of issuing currency and the creation of fiat money. Since then we ceased being the United State(S) and became the United State.

I wouldn’t be surprised if authoritarians in the U.S. used “General Welfare” as justification for imposing COVID jab mandates on the public. Heck, there were those who used a Supreme Court ruling from waaaaaay back in 1905 to claim that the government had authority to MANDATE COVID JABS despite the fact the jabs were under EUA.

The General Welfare clause is not the only poison pill in the Constitution. There is the Interstate Commerce clause which is often twisted to insane lengths.
Using that clause they have already established precedent to have the power to regulate anything even home gardens. The theory on home gardens is that if you grow stringbeans in your yard you won’t buy stringbeans from Georgia therefore “Interstate commerce” is affected.

THE TWELVE PRESUMPTIONS OF COURT

A Roman Court does not operate according to any true rule of law, but by presumptions of the law. Therefore, if presumptions presented by the private Bar Guild are not rebutted they become fact and are therefore said to stand true [Or as “truth in commerce”]. There are twelve (12) key presumptions asserted by the private Bar Guilds which if unchallenged stand true being Public Record, Public Service, Public Oath, Immunity, Summons, Custody, Court of Guardians, Court of Trustees, Government as Executor/Beneficiary, Executor De Son Tort (a person who without legal authority assumes control of a decedent’s property as if he were executor), Incompetence, and Guilt:

1. The Presumption of Public Record is that any matter brought before a lower Roman Courts is a matter for the public record when in fact it is presumed by the members of the private Bar Guild that the matter is a private Bar Guild business matter. Unless openly rebuked and rejected by stating clearly the matter is to be on the Public Record, the matter remains a private Bar Guild matter completely under private Bar Guild rules; and

2. The Presumption of Public Service is that all the members of the Private Bar Guild who have all sworn a solemn secret absolute oath to their Guild then act as public agents of the Government, or “public officials” by making additional oaths of public office that openly and deliberately contradict their private “superior” oaths to their own Guild. Unless openly rebuked and rejected, the claim stands that these private Bar Guild members are legitimate public servants and therefore trustees under public oath; and

3. The Presumption of Public Oath is that all members of the Private Bar Guild acting in the capacity of “public officials” who have sworn a solemn public oath remain bound by that oath and therefore bound to serve honestly, impartiality and fairly as dictated by their oath. Unless openly challenged and demanded, the presumption stands that the Private Bar Guild members have functioned under their public oath in contradiction to their Guild oath. If challenged, such individuals must recuse themselves as having a conflict of interest and cannot possibly stand under a public oath; and

4. The Presumption of Immunity is that key members of the Private Bar Guild in the capacity of “public officials” acting as judges, prosecutors and magistrates who have sworn a solemn public oath in good faith are immune from personal claims of injury and liability. Unless openly challenged and their oath demanded, the presumption stands that the members of the Private Bar Guild as public trustees acting as judges, prosecutors and magistrates are immune from any personal accountability for their actions; and

5. The Presumption of Summons is that by custom a summons unrebutted stands and therefore one who attends Court is presumed to accept a position (defendant, juror, witness) and jurisdiction of the court. Attendance to court is usually invitation by summons. Unless the summons is rejected and returned, with a copy of the rejection filed prior to choosing to visit or attend, jurisdiction and position as the accused and the existence of “guilt” stands; and

6. The Presumption of Custody is that by custom a summons or warrant for arrest unrebutted stands and therefore one who attends Court is presumed to be a thing and therefore liable to be detained in custody by “Custodians”. [This includes the dead legal fiction non-human “PERSON” that corporate-governments rules and regulations are written for.*] Custodians may only lawfully hold custody of property and “things” not flesh and blood soul possessing beings. Unless this presumption is openly challenged by rejection of summons and/or at court, the presumption stands you are a thing and property and therefore lawfully able to be kept in custody by custodians; and

7. The Presumption of Court of Guardians is the presumption that as you may be listed as a “resident” of a ward of a local government area and have listed on your “passport” the letter P, you are a pauper and therefore under the “Guardian” powers of the government and its agents as a “Court of Guardians”. Unless this presumption is openly challenged to demonstrate you are both a general guardian and general executor of the matter (trust) before the court, the presumption stands and you are by default a pauper, and lunatic and therefore must obey the rules of the clerk of guardians (clerk of magistrates court);

8. The Presumption of Court of Trustees is that members of the Private Bar Guild presume you accept the office of trustee as a “public servant” and “government employee” just by attending a Roman Court, as such Courts are always for public trustees by the rules of the Guild and the Roman System. Unless this presumption is openly challenged to state you are merely visiting by “invitation” to clear up the matter and you are not a government employee or public trustee in this instance, the presumption stands and is assumed as one of the most significant reasons to claim jurisdiction – simply because you “appeared”; and

9. The Presumption of Government acting in two roles as Executor and Beneficiary is that for the matter at hand, the Private Bar Guild appoint the judge/magistrate in the capacity of Executor while the Prosecutor acts in the capacity of Beneficiary of the trust for the current matter. Unless this presumption is openly challenged to demonstrate you are both a general guardian and general executor of the matter (trust) before the court, the presumption stands and you are by default the trustee, therefore must obey the rules of the executor (judge/magistrate); and

10. The Presumption of Executor De Son Tort is the presumption that if the accused does seek to assert their right as Executor and Beneficiary over their body, mind and soul they are acting as an Executor De Son Tort or a “false executor” challenging the “rightful” judge as Executor. Therefore, the judge/magistrate assumes the role of “true” executor and has the right to have you arrested, detained, fined or forced into a psychiatric evaluation. Unless this presumption is openly challenged by not only asserting one’s position as Executor as well as questioning if the judge or magistrate is seeking to act as Executor De Son Tort, the presumption stands and a judge or magistrate of the private Bar guild may seek to assistance of bailiffs or sheriffs to assert their false claim; and

11. The Presumption of Incompetence is the presumption that you are at least ignorant of the law, therefore incompetent to present yourself and argue properly. Therefore, the judge/magistrate as executor has the right to have you arrested, detained, fined or forced into a psychiatric evaluation. Unless this presumption is openly challenged to the fact that you know your position as executor and beneficiary and actively rebuke and object to any contrary presumptions, then it stands by the time of pleading that you are incompetent then the judge or magistrate can do what they need to keep you obedient; and

12. The Presumption of Guilt is the presumption that as it is presumed to be a private business meeting of the Bar Guild, you are guilty whether you plead “guilty”, do not plead or plead “not guilty”. Therefore unless you either have previously prepared an affidavit of truth and motion to dismiss with extreme prejudice onto the public record or call a demurrer, then the presumption is you are guilty and the private Bar Guild can hold you until a bond is prepared to guarantee the amount the guild wants to profit from you.

“But whether the Constitution really be one thing, or another, this much is certain that it has either authorized such a government as we have had, or has been powerless to prevent it. In either case, it is unfit to exist.” Lysander Spooner

The government has no authority to create millions of laws, regulations, statutes, etc.

but….THEY SAY….. they have authority, are sovereign……

but…… it is the people who are sovereign, they just hired government workers as servants….joe boys to fix roads, sewers, etc. only….

you are either sovereign or a slave…….

People are sovereign…only God is above them……

The pedosatanists government say they are God so above men…..

There is only one law…do no harm….which includes….honor your contracts and don’t steal…..

These unjust, illegal laws can be canceled with trial by jury trials….there is millions of them….it might take awhile….

First they went after your car…through regulations, your house is next……make it very expensive to retrofit your house to the new energy/emission standards through regulations….

AN Englishman’s home
used to be his castle, but
companies could soon
have the legal right to use
‘reasonable force’ to enter
your property and force-fit a
smart meter.

‘Using reasonable force’ is the
kind of vague, slippery language
that could result in mobs of
police, sometimes armed, forcing
their way into people’s homes.

And all because they do not want
a device that will not only spy on
them, but will also restrict their
energy use.

In the Bill, an ‘energy smart
appliance’ means ‘an appliance
that is capable of adjusting
the immediate or future flow of
electricity into or out of itself’.
So there can be no doubting what
this legislation is intended to
do –

control people’s energy use,
which could then become a carrot
and stick, using social credit
systems and other means to get
people to acquiesce to the green
agenda, experimental vaccines,
or anything else they want to do.

Further, owners can be fined up to
£15,000 and sentenced to up to
one year in prison for refusing to
have…….
an energy assessment and
work done on their premises……

to upgrade your house to new energy standards…heating systems, insulation, new appliances, new windows, etc., could cost $50,000 to $100,000 or more…

public policy – driven
from above by the UN and WEF
(see Page 16), whom the public
do not vote for …..

Who in their right mind thinks
it’s perfectly normal to block off
roads with planters and bollards
in order to get people to drive
less? It means longer journeys
and more emissions,

Fortunately, the public has
started to cotton on to what is
being done, and many Ultra Low
Emission Zone (ULEZ) cameras
and fixtures have been destroyed
in recent weeks.

How much will
be spent before councils give up?
‘Net zero’ policies are designed to
impoverish us. China, Russia and
India don’t have them, but we all
share the environment, don’t we?

https://thelightpaper.co.uk/assets/pdf/Light-37-Sept-23-Web-Final_2023-09-22-090854.pdf

I would suggest the fault doesn’t rest with the document itself, but with the evil in the hearts of those who, with every breath, intone their virtue, and that of the superstate. Over 200 years time, we let them succeed by not handing them their heads. The death of a thousand cuts comes to mind. The only upshot is, the same principle is now being used by the universe against them. The incompetence in the ranks of those employed the Garbage Elite shows their weakness. The whole edifice of civilization now has the unpleasant aroma of debt and death. Thanks Elites for showing us your true selfs.

Its human nature. The types attracted to power, being corrupted, seek to corrupt the good that was this country. Greaseball lawyers do what greaseball lawyers do. Its as it has always been, like waves upon waves pounding against the sea wall corrupting the underpinnings of the foundation.

Their only true power is the power of their fake AF money. The only true weapon we have against it is withholding the fruits of our labor, in other words the power of NO.

The constitution is a corporate charter document. The original 13 colonies were corporations, chartered by the king, for the purpose of supporting Britan’s (Europe’s) mercantilist economy. When the Articles of Confederation, basically a franchise agreement, didn’t work out due to the former colonies not paying their franchise fees, the corporation changed the charter. The new doc included provisions for forcing the colonies to pay, so it worked out better.

And corporate charters go back to Roman times. Even the medival church was a corporation of sorts (more of a franchise operation). It only made sense for the colonies/states to continue this tradition. The difference in North America is that the corporation sprung up from the whole, not royal edict. I used to think that the corporate structure (CEO, board, shareholders) roughly mirrored the federal system, but it turns out that the opposite is true. The federal system developed from the corporation.

Mercantilist economic systems require production in low cost areas and sales to high cost areas. But like water seeking its own level, the low cost areas rise up to become high cost areas. So then the race is on to find another low cost area to shift production to. Problem is, eventually you run out of low cost production. So you either destroy a high cost area or add technology. The US has done pretty well at adding technology but that’s pretty much played out. Asia too. So now we either go back to Africa, which seems notoriously hard to make productive, or destroy. The people who are moving capital around believe they can selectively destroy some areas while preserving others. Time will tell how that works out, but my guess is it won’t.

Eric’s post is spot on!

Yep,,, it was a coup (Con Con), although a nice quiet one brought to us by the same folks that convinced enough of the population to break from England. After the war, the Articles were introduced which made the States sovereign and the People of those States citizens of those States. The Federal government was nothing more than a interlocutor for the States to the rest of the nations of the world. Any funding came from the individual States. All wars had to be approved by the States. This was necessary as that was how most felt it should be in that time period. But many of the ‘founders’ actually favored a strong central government. During the intermediate years they wrote the constitution we have today,,, same as was done with the ‘Patriot’ Act and other wildly unsupported legislation, all waiting for just the right moment. In our time that moment was nahnlevin. In their day it was Tariffs.

The ‘founders’ had the constitution at the ready and brought it forth when the time was right. The new constitution only required nine states to ratify whereas the Articles required all. They then squabbled about the Peoples rights. Voila,,, the ten commandments (amendments). These amendments were to ensure the government would/could not usurp the Peoples natural (God given) rights. The Problem? These amendments should have been in the body of the constitution,,, verse addons. Secondly they should have been sticky,,, no changes or eliminations allowed.

As Eric says,,, they wording was extremely loose ( lawyeresk) allowing massive differences in definitions. Today they skirt around the Bill of Rights as they are called by the propagandists easily. Most of the time they use ‘safety’ as their excuse… the general welfare clause. The loose wording, interstate commerce clause, allowed them control over appliances, automobiles, and everything else in our lives. The defining power of regulation given illegally to Agencies (FDA, EPA, ETC) , of statute law passed by con-gress, created mini fiefdoms within the government. Their regulations become defacto law. Bad business for us.

The present constitution reeks of tyranny and for those s(elected) unimaginable wealth and power which they are now unabashedly using to destroy what was once called America. This wealth and power is so addictive that many refuse to leave their position. One just died at age 90. The control over S(elections) is so great that it is a piece of cake to be re-s(elected).

IMO there is no solution. We are a tower of babble where no one agrees with anyone else. Without unification they have us by the short hairs.

“Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts
and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and
general Welfare of the United States”
Which is an apologetic excuse for assuming the power to tax. So the common defense and general welfare can be paid for. If they can be enacted in regard to the enumerated powers. Common defense can be. It is mentioned in the enumerated powers. General welfare cannot be. It is not mentioned in the enumerated powers. It is simply implied that all the enumerated powers serve the general welfare. No additional power in addition is implied. But, after all, it appears that lawyers and judges can’t read.

Regarding “climate change”. I was led to believe earlier in life that “climate change”, in the political context, was promoted in place of “global warming” by Republicans because it produced less of a visceral reaction.

Apparently and supposedly, this was done by George W. as advised by one Frank Luntz:
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2003/mar/04/usnews.climatechange

“The phrase “global warming” should be abandoned in favour of “climate change”, Mr Luntz says…”

“The phrase ‘global warming’ appeared frequently in President Bush’s speeches in 2001, but decreased to almost nothing during 2002, when the [Luntz] memo was produced.”

Now, to be less unctuous and nebulous, they could always go with “Anthropogenic Global Warming” but that first word seems to lose people.

I prefer an older term, from an 1971 MIT book which I’d like to read sometime to see just how accurate any of its postulates and predictions have been found:

https://archive.org/details/inadvertentclima0000stud/mode/2up

The term is “Inadvertent Climate Modification”.

That’s what they’re driving at, right?

But then, perhaps Eric is correct, and “climate change” is purposefully slippery and nebulous, as to encompass any phenomena necessary to advance an agenda.

I don’t think that even the Federalists imagined today’s regulatory state, because the legal foundations for it didn’t exist in anything the Federalist Papers promoted (the anti-Federalist papers were heroic too). The Federalists and anti-Federalists hashed out a great debate via these papers. There was no Twitter back then so they had to do it by publishing in newspapers.

Our regulatory state was born on November 9th, 1942, due to the Supreme Court case Wickard v Filburn. In 1938, Roosevelt enacted the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938, which limited how much farmers could produce and sell. Roscoe Filburn grew more wheat than Roosevelt allowed him to grow (or more precisely, a bureaucrat named Wickard), but since he never sold the wheat but instead, fed it to his animals, he argued that the law was not applicable. The Supreme Court decided that by growing your own crops, even if you don’t sell them and even if they don’t cross state lines, affect prices across state lines, because by growing your own, you are actually avoiding buying on the market, and that does cross state lines. This creative interpretation of the Interstate Commerce Clause is the basis for all regulation today. Prior to this, the Federal government could only intervene in interstate commerce, nothing within a state, and that power was left to the states.

The Federalists wanted a strong federal government of enlightened aristocrats leading the US, and I don’t think even they imagined what we’d have today.

‘These were the Federalist Papers. They were very well-written, too.’ — eric

Yep. As a callow youth, I actually thought the Federalist Papers sounded vaguely libertarian — small government, a well-regulated militia, and all that rot. Now I realize I was duped — the same way a smooth-talking black dude in Washington Square Park once sold me a bag of parsley, then — the apotheosis of his own stereotype — accompanied me down Waverly Place, proclaiming how he just luvvvvvved to eat p*ssy.

Now The Farce has come to this:

‘According to Mediaite with the exclusive first story, Robert Kennedy Jr will announce his transition from a candidate on the Democrat ticket to a candidate on the Independent ticket for the 2024 presidential contest. RFK Jr will make the announcement on October 9th, in Pennsylvania.

‘Stop thinking about RFK Jr. taking votes from Biden. Unfortunately, this will be the narrative; this will be what is polled. However, Joe Biden will not be the DNC nominee.

‘RFK Jr running as an independent will tilt the election to Gavin Newsom. This is an op.’

https://tinyurl.com/4ef9v93t

It’s Ross Perot vs George H W Bush all over again, handing Clinton [Newsom] the win with only forty-something percent of the votes.

Gad! GAH! Off the take out my feckless rage, swinging a Pulaski ax to demolish manzanita, deep in the uncaring forest.

It’s why whenever I hear some Republican douche spew out “limited government” my toes curl in my shoes and I want to throw things. Limited how? Where? To what extent? Or “family values” – whose family? What values? Or “conservative” – conserving what? All of this is why we can’t have nice things.