2024 Toyota Land Cruiser

19
8933

For once, a new vehicle cost less than what it used to cost. In the case of the new Toyota Land Cruiser, tens of thousands less than it used to.

Of course, there’s a price to be paid for that.

But it might be one many don’t mind paying.

What It Is

The Land Cruiser is a mid-sized, real-deal SUV – as opposed to a car-based crossover that looks like an SUV. What’s the difference? It’s generally what you can’t see. An SUV – if it’s a real-deal SUV – will be equipped with four wheel drive rather than all-wheel drive and will usually have a two speed transfer case and Low range gearing. It will also usually be built on a sturdier chassis, in order to capable of pulling more than just a lightweight trailer.

The Land Cruiser has always been a real-deal SUV and so is the new one, with the difference being this one costs about $30k less to start.

Base price – for the ’24 model – is $55,950. As opposed to $85,655 back in 2021 – which was the last time you could buy a new Land Cruiser.

You can buy a top-of-the-line ’24 Land Cruiser First Edition for $74,950 – which is till about $10k less than it cost to buy a base-trim 2021 Land Cruiser.

So . . . what’s the catch?

Well, the ’24 Land Cruiser is slightly smaller and it no longer offers a third row, which you used to be able to get in the old model. There’s also something smaller under the hood. Instead of the V8 you used to get, there’s a standard turbocharged four paired up with a mild-hybrid system. It doesn’t make as much horsepower as the V8 did – and the new Land Cruiser’s maximum towing capacity is down by about 2,000 lbs.

But it also weighs about 800 lbs. less than it did before – and it gets about 10 miles-per-gallon better mileage than it did.

Besides which, you’ll have about $30k left in your pocket to spend on gas rather than payments.

What’s New for 2024

The Land Cruiser returns after a three-year hiatus. It is no longer in direct competition with the larger (and three-row) Sequoia. Instead, it targets the Ford Bronco and the Jeep Wrangler, both of which are available in two and four-door versions and less expensive to start – but which are smaller and have less powerful standard engines and lower standard towing capacity.

What’s Good

A much more affordable Land Cruiser.

A more off-road-capable Land Cruiser.

A much-less-thirsty Land Cruiser.

What’s Not So Good

No more third row.

No more V8.

Less affordable than Bronco and Wrangler.

Under The Hood

The last (2021) Land Cruiser came standard with a 5.7 liter V8 that made 381 horsepower all by itself; the re-imagined ’24 Land Cruiser has a 2.4 liter four cylinder engine that makes 326 horsepower, courtesy of a turbocharger and a mild-hybrid tandem powertrain consisting of a pair of electric motors and a battery pack that feeds them electricity while it gets recharged by the running engine.

The end result is a new Land Cruiser that’s a little bit less quick than the old Land Cruiser – 0-60 takes about 7.7 seconds vs. about 7 flat for the V8 LC – but significantly less thirsty, especially in stop-and-go “city” driving, where the hybrid set-up operates most efficiently because the engine can be cycled off more frequently. In that kind of driving, the new Land Cruiser rates 22 MPG – as opposed to 13 MPG for the previous, V8-powered Land Cruiser. There’s also a significant difference in mileage on the highway. The old V8 Land Cruiser posted just 17 MPG. The new turbo-hybrid Land Cruiser ups that to 25, which is no small thing for Toyota – which is under immense pressure to up the mileage of everything it sells, irrespective of customer wants.

The mild-hybrid setup is Toyota’s way of keeping the government and its customers happy.

Something the latter will likely be happy about is the new LC’s significantly increased range, which was just 319 miles in city driving and 418 miles on the highway. It is now 393 miles in the city and 447 on the highway. It would be a lot more than that, too, if the new LC had the same 25 gallon gas tank that the old LC had. But the new LC’s tank only holds 18 gallons. If it held 25 – as it did before – the new LC’s city-driving range would be closer to 550 miles and more than 600 miles on the highway.

Arguably, Toyota should have found room for a 25 gallon tank as that would have made the efficiency difference between the new LC and the old much more obvious and so a more self-evident selling point.

But the space for the tank was likely reduced by the need to make room for the hybrid motors and battery pack.

An eight speed automatic transmission is standard – as is a full-time 4WD system with driver-selectable High and Low ranges as well as locking center and rear differentials, second gear crawl (electronically engaged) and Hill Descent Control.

On The Road

There is only one thing missing here. It isn’t horsepower – or a positive reaction when you ask for acceleration. The new four cylinder/hybrid LC does not accelerate like a four cylinder-powered, 5,000 lb. SUV.

It just sounds like one.

To Toyota’s credit, there is no sound augmentation technology to  make it sound as if there’s still a V8 under the hood. The sound you hear reflects what’s actually under the hood. It’s not a bad sound, either. Just a somewhat disappointing one in view of the sound that’s no longer made.

And not just under this Toyota’s hood, either.

Engines are getting smaller in practically everything – and turbos/hybrid-assist are being used to make up for what’s not there anymore.

The old LC’s V8 sounded like what you’d expect to hear in an $85,000 SUV. The new LC’s sound is what you get in a $55,000 SUV.

But you still get acceleration comparable to what you used to have to pay $85k to get – and you also get the Land Cruiser, itself. This is how Toyota brought it back from the grave – and makes it available to you for $30k less than what it used to cost.

The rest is happily the same – in that the new LC feels like a LC. It does not feel like a crossover. Not – per Seinfeld – that there is anything wrong with crossovers. The point is they’re not SUVs and so feel (and drive) more like the front-wheel-drive cars platforms they’re typically based upon. The LC feels much heavier – which it is – and much more rugged which it also is. It weighs 5,038 lbs. – which is about 800 lbs. less than the old LC but still beefy and still good, if you like the feel of a beefy vehicle that’s also light on its feet.

The new LC’s turn-in is sharper and it feels more agile – even though it’s only slightly smaller (in terms of overall length) than the old LC. Dropping 800 pounds – much of that off the nose – helps with that.

And not having a set of leaf springs fore and aft helps a lot with the ride.

Most of the off-road stuff is essentially automatic, including the 4WD. Low range is engaged via a console-mounted switch rather than a lever and there is a knob on the dash that is rotated to switch from Power to Normal to Eco driving modes. Locking the diffs is also a matter of selecting the appropriate switch. All of this makes it easy to get anywhere – as James Brown used to say.

Even better, you can see where you’re going. The LC’s dash and side glass are tall (the door side glass actually drops below the line of the windshield) and so the view to all sides is expansive – even more important off-road than on.

At The Curb 

The old (2021) LC looked more like a Sequoia looked back in 2021 and even though the latter was larger, it cost less. Both also had third rows – adding to the confusion.

The new LC looks like a LC. It is retro-boxy, like the original 1958 model – hence the designation. There’s also no third row, which makes sense anyhow – because the old LC’s third row was more hypothetical than actual, in terms of people (adults) being able to realistically sit back there. Kids, maybe – but the LC was never supposed to be a family vehicle, primarily.

And now it isn’t, again.

While the exterior shape is retro-familiar, a nod back at the LC’s original looks – the inside is entirely 2024.

The displays are just that – rather than the mechanical (and actual) needles swinging around faces that stayed the same, as back in ’58. The main panel and the secondary panel are LCDs now, in keeping with the times – and they have the advantage of being able to display more info than there would be space to display if Toyota had gone really retro and fitted the new LC with a basic gauge package, as you got back in the day.

You also get both heated seats and steering wheel – standard – neither of of which were even available, back in the day. Both make driving the new LC when it’s cold out a vastly more civilized experience and the seats are vastly more comfortable, too. One might add – for an SUV – but that would be unfair. The seats in this rig are more comfortable than the chairs in most cars. They are soft and supportive, a hard balance to manage.

Try them. You will like them. Especially if you try them for five or six hours straight.

You also get about 38 cubic feet of cargo space behind the second row and 82 cubic feet with the second row folded forward. The old three-row LC only has 16.1 cubic feet of cargo space left behind its third row.

Something you don’t get, on the other hand, are old-style (rectangular) USB charge ports. But you do get several of the new USB “c” (round) outlets.

The Rest

A curious loss is the new LC’s diminished maximum towing capacity, which is now just 6,000 lbs. That is still sufficient to pull a small RV but it’s well below the 8,100 lbs. the old LC could tow.

The disparity is odd because even though the new LC does not have a V8, its turbo-hybrid drivetrain actually makes more torque (465 ft.-lbs.) than the old LC’s V8 did 418 ft.-lbs.) and makes it sooner, courtesy of the turbo-hybrid boost. The new LC’s frame/underthings are not flimsy, either. So it must either be something to do with the hybrid side of things – maybe the electric motors? – and worries about overheating something.

Or it has something to do with Toyota wanting to give buyers who want more towing capacity a reason to buy a Sequoia instead. The new model has a turbo-hybrid V6 that makes 583 ft.-lbs. of torque and it can tow 9,500 lbs.

The Bottom Line

It’s rare for any manufacture to reduce the price of a new model, let alone by $30,000. You may not get a V8 for the money.

But you’re still getting a Land Cruiser. And – thanks to the massive price cut – more people will be able to get one now.

. . .

If you like what you’ve found here please consider supporting EPautos. 

We depend on you to keep the wheels turning! 

Our donate button is here.

 If you prefer not to use PayPal, our mailing address is:

EPautos
721 Hummingbird Lane SE
Copper Hill, VA 24079

PS: Get an EPautos magnet or sticker or coaster in return for a $20 or more one-time donation or a $10 or more monthly recurring donation. (Please be sure to tell us you want a magnet or sticker or coaster – and also, provide an address, so we know where to mail the thing!)

If you like items like the Baaaaaa! baseball cap pictured below, you can find that and more at the EPautos store!

 

19 COMMENTS

  1. Toyota is starting to have problems with it’s new engines…

    Their 1st generation V8 was a good reliable engine…it had a cast iron block and was simpler…no variable valve timing…

    Their 2nd generation V8 wasn’t as good, had problems…

    Their 3rd generation V8 got worse, it has aluminum heads and block…..it dropped valves, had timing chain tensioner issues and is now chewing up…blowing head gaskets….

    Now their new twin turbo V6 is even worse….

    It is not just Toyota…new engines in general are having more issues….too complicated, over stressed…higher output, aluminum blocks, harder to rebuild…just scrap them…install a new engine….for a lot of money….

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dfGTI0sWozc

    • Hi Anon,

      The 5.7 V8 seems to have been a good (reliable, durable) engine as far as I can tell. The new twin-turbo V6 is already a catastrophe – for buyers and more so for Toyota. The damage done to the latter’s rep for quality is now at Yugo levels. Worse, actually – because people understood what they were getting when they bought a Yugo…

  2. Hi Eric,

    The Landcruiser you are getting is the evolution of the 250 Series Prado; the Landcruiser you formerly got was the 200 Series LandCruiser, which has now evolved into the 300 Series in much of the world.

    That’s why the new LandCruiser in the US is smaller, cheaper etc.

    No bad thing, the 250 Series is tow pony of choice for Australia’s grey nomads as they do ‘the lap’. The 300 Series still rules supreme for status in the bush, though. Both are all diesel here, with the 250 Series (and this new one) to get the 2.8 I4 diesel, and the 300 Series getting a 3.3L V6 diesel (after the 200 series had a 4.5L V8 diesel that was expensive when dusted and failed!) In terms of build quality, long term reliability and resale they rule Australia – though please do note problems in recent years with the diesels, they aren’t perfect and personally would prefer a simple petrol.

    And we get the 70 Series LandCruiser as well – 76 Series wagon, 78 series troopy and 79 Series ute. Changing over from 4.5L V8 diesel to 2.8L diesel here, very popular on mines and farms.

    Out of interest, American RAMs, F-150s and Silverados are now imported here (right hand drive conversions) and have landed into Cruiser money and provided an alternative, more space, and petrol V8s. Inner city councils love them 😉

    • Hi Yuri,

      I forgot to mention the electric power steering; it’s become so common I didn’t think to. But – you’re right – though much less expensive to buy now, the new LC is likely tyo be more expensive to keep, as the years go by. I much prefer the old models, like the ’91 I was looking at the other day.

  3. There’s already several of these and new GX’s in my neighborhood. These are basically the same as the gen six 4runner but higher price tag, and not much cheaper than the new Lexus GX which seems the superior model in every way. For many Toyota 4×4 enthusiasts like me this new model doesn’t hold much appeal. I much prefer the vehicle in my driveway, 2021 4runner, which cost $44k and you could finance <3%APR. Additionally, the GVWR on the 5th gen 4runner was just over 6k so I was able to use section 179 depreciation. This new model at this price and financing is just absurd even for people that can afford it. These new models are antithetical to the value you think of when you think of Toyota 4×4. The powertrain and digital cluster just adds insult to injury. I don't see this model doing well over the long term. New 4runner coming soon which is virtually the same as the LC250 but cheaper. That model also is a step down from current 4runner. Sad state of affairs.

  4. I saw one in the wild yesterday. A really good looking truck.

    Thanks for the review, Eric! I hope you got it into some mud and over some rocks!

  5. Glad to see this seems to have your blessing Eric. For some reason this is one of the few cars I’ve looked forward to in a while. It’s interesting in the UK we do get a 7 seat option. The only disappointment is to get a 6 you need to get the Lexus version… which looks a bit too bling for my liking. Though hoping they will soon put the 6cyl in this as well…

    Another interesting thing is they’re still offering the full sized Land Cruiser in others markets (particularly the Middle East and Asia). Which is interesting – as not long ago it was the US where every company’s flagship model was sold…. Sad but can’t think of a bigger sign of a decline….

  6. Good write-up. Is this perhaps similar to the old FJ cruiser? Some of the pictures remind me of it, but I’ve only owned a 4Runner. Speaking of which, how does this fit into the 4Runner–Sequoia paradigm? More towards the former now?

    • Thanks, JSR!

      In re your question: Toyota’s intention seems to be to slot the new LC below the Sequoia in terms of size (and cost) and above the 4Runner in capability/power.

    • First thought I had when I saw Eric’s lead photo of the LC was how similar it looked to an FJ. …On second glance though, it sure does look a lot like a Bronco, too.

      That LC looks nice, howevah; my FJ with a V-6 is just now nudging 100,000 miles, I think it’s my forever car. …Never thought I’d have a forever car.

      • You like it? I’ve heard of complaints from FJ owners about the almost straight windshield causing frequent chips and cracks.

        • I love it. One chip, no cracks. Can use controls with gloves on. Analog dashboard. Room enough that elbows don’t rub the passengers elbows. Gets around good in the snow & on ice. Doesn’t get super hot inside when parked in the Summer Sun. V-6 has enough power for what it needs.

  7. Used Land Cruisers are kind of expensive.

    What the heck? If Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) can sell for 136 dollars per share with a PE of 157, 10 times or more for a normal stock price PE ratio, you have to realize that it is a huge bubble.

    Jury the Clown dollar bill is priced at 1899 dollars. One Jury the Clown dollar bill will buy 190 shares of Ford Motor Company.

    Clown world out there, Israel is full of them.

    Turn on the bubble machine, t’ank you, boys, as Lawrence would always say. Had new Dodges on his show.

  8. I suspect the imperative behind the lower price is to help it sell better. Either way you slice it $55,000 is more affordable than $85,000 let alone an inflation hiked 2021 price. If the 2021 price was adjusted for inflation the LC would probably be over $100,000.

    Only time will tell how it survives spirited off road driving. It’s hard to tell from the pictures Eric but are the hybrid batteries protected enough from rough road or rock climbing incidents?

  9. Smaller, lighter, and cheaper than the previous model? That’s radical.

    Probably 95% of model refreshes go the other way — bigger, porkier, and costlier.

    On the other hand, anyone wanting something like the original Land Cruiser — a brute simple, utilitarian vehicle that resembled the US military jeep of the time — is just sheet out of luck.

    A Land Cruiser retrospective shows a rather strange evolution over the decades, with bland, car-like vehicles in its middle years shifting back to a ruggeder build in the 21st century.

    https://www.caranddriver.com/features/g20901778/cruisin-for-a-bruisin-the-visual-history-of-the-toyota-land-cruiser/?slide=18

    At least the Land Cruiser is now pointed in the right direction — although mandates from the dead hand of the US fedgov make it impossible to build lightweight, simple vehicles anymore. 🙁

  10. @Eric – The USB-C port is an upgrade over USB-A in terms of output wattage standard.

    You can always buy a new cable or an adapter, but the question is whether the ports are just charging or a gateway for devices to get plugged into the hive mind.

    And USB-C still isn’t a substitute for the 12V “cigarette lighter” port, which is increasingly an endagered species on new vehicles.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here