The Ford Lightning electric truck may not be goin’ any damn where – to paraphrase what the Toothless Man with the shotgun told Jon Voight in Deliverance – but the little Maverick pickup is going Lobo.
Probably because the latter actually does go – while the former doesn’t go very far.
Ford expected – Ford had hoped – the Lightning was going to be a big hit and a cash cow. It wasn’t. Cash has bled. Like Jon Voight did, when the inbred cracker tried out his knife on him.
The underlying idea wasn’t bad in that a big truck seemed like the ideal place to house a big battery, as opposed to the much smaller space inside a car or even a crossover. And devices need big batteries because they don’t store much energy otherwise.
The fly in the soup was that a big truck is already heavy – even if it has an aluminum-skinned body. A standard – non-electric – 2024 F-150 SuperCrew weighs 4,687 lbs. or more than two tons. It takes a lot of charge to get that much weight moving (especially if it’s also towing another several thousand pounds). So Ford installed a battery that weighs almost two tons more in this device and the result is a three-ton half-ton pick-up that doesn’t go very far because it can’t – on account of all that weight .
The device is also much more expensive than the regular F-150, chiefly on account of that huge (and heavy) battery.
Unsurprisingly, it has not sold well.
Unlike the Maverick, which Ford probably never thought would do as well as it has. But it’s been easily the most successful new model Ford has introduced in years. Probably because it’s not a device – and because it’s useful, as most people expect a truck to be. It goes about twice as far before it has to stop (495 highway miles; 380 in the city vs. 240, maybe) and it only takes a few minutes to get going again. It also costs less than half as much to buy ($23,920 to start) as the device – which starts at $54,955 – Ford had hoped would sell to people who didn’t actually need a truck.
Ford has a hit – and a flop – on its hands. To make up for the latter, Ford is going Lobo with the Maverick.
The Lobo is a new, high-performance iteration of the 2025 Maverick that ups the fun factor, making this truck appealing on another level.
Without taking away from its original appeal – because it’s still a truck rather than a device that looks like one.
The bed remains – and so does the range as well as the absence of inconvenience. Added to that is drifting capability, via a stability/traction control system that partially disables itself when the driver requests, allowing the rear end to swing wide by permitting the rear tires to lose traction.
For once, “safety” isn’t first.
Of course, it’s not “unsafe” to drift, if you know what you’re doing. There’s an increased risk that something might go awry, of course. But that is not the same thing as unsafe – though the distinction has been muddied by neurotic control freaks who consider any risk (which encompasses any kind of driving) “unsafe.”
The Lobo also gets a unique-to-this trim twin-clutch, torque-vectoring rear axle and an upgraded, heavy-duty seven speed automatic transmission with one less forward gear than the eight speed automatic that’s standard in other Mavericks. The idea being to increase responsiveness by decreasing the number of up (and down) shifts and the time it takes for that to happen. Ford has also tweaked up the boost of the turbocharged 2.0 liter engine that’s standard in regular Mavericks, which already makes 250 horsepower.
Heavy-duty cooling is part of the package.
So also a set of matte-black “turbine” wheels that appear to have been borrowed from a third generation Pontiac Trans-Am. They looked great back then and they look just as good now.
Upgraded brakes pirated from the European-market Focus ST (which is no longer sold here) plus a lowered suspension and a wider body complete the look – and the function. Without the result being either unaffordable – you’ll be able to pick up a new Lobo for around $35,000 to start – or impractical. The lowered ride height and sticky, street-performance tires will reduce the Lobo’s off-road capabilities. But it will still have the ability to haul a load in its bed without having to stop every 100 miles or less and make you wait hours for a charge, as the device that looks like a truck does.
That means it works, which is what used to define the appeal of a truck before someone at Ford decided to make one that doesn’t. Luckily – for Ford – someone also decided to make another one that does, which may ultimately save Ford.
If Ford stops making devices like the Lightning – and ramps up production of trucks like the Maverick. And not just the Lobo iteration. How about a regular or even just an extended cab version with an eight foot bed and an even lower starting price, so that even more people who need a truck that works would be able to buy one.
That’d be really Lobo.
. . .
If you like what you’ve found here please consider supporting EPautos.
We depend on you to keep the wheels turning!
Our donate button is here.
If you prefer not to use PayPal, our mailing address is:
EPautos
721 Hummingbird Lane SE
Copper Hill, VA 24079
PS: Get an EPautos magnet or sticker or coaster in return for a $20 or more one-time donation or a $10 or more monthly recurring donation. (Please be sure to tell us you want a magnet or sticker or coaster – and also, provide an address, so we know where to mail the thing!)
If you like items like the Baaaaaa! baseball cap pictured below, you can find that and more at the EPautos store!
Eric, how is the durability panning out of the Eco-Boosts…Been reading many mechanics on various vlogs touting their tendencies to “Eco-BLOW”.
That’s for earlier models of the 2.0 – in the 2018-19 range. The issue has been sorted.
Unfortunately, the price has been raised (again) to over 26k for the base XL. Between that, losing 12 HP on the Ecoboost due to a new emissions particulate filter, losing switches for the HVAC controls (though a larger screen), and the new front fascia styling makes me glad I bought my 24 when I did!
I appreciate the Mrs Kravitz picture. Half of the country has been turned into the likes of Mrs Kravitz.
Lobo as in lobotomy?
Now put a diesel in it
Sadly, Ford cut the horsepower for 2025 in the EcoBoost models, including the Lobo. It’s down to 238 from 250. You can probably guess why. https://fordauthority.com/2024/08/heres-why-the-2025-ford-maverick-ecoboost-is-down-12-horsepower/amp/
Gas particulate filters? I knew it was emissions control.
Do you guys not take them off? In the UK there its a whole gig around removing DPFs and not getting caught…
Finally Ford is doing something right, lately. That trick rear sounds like it’s coming off the once great Focus RS. Any idea on HP/torque, price? Is this little truck actually happening, or is it a test tease?
In other news, heard Stellantis is shutting down it’s Detroit Chrysler building and all it’s staff? Sounds like it’s over. Also heard major US dealer groups gave the CEO a piece of their mind.
Can/will any US based automaker be able to buy the once great Dodge, and good Ram?
I’ve personally seen, and been effected by, an EU conglomerate hurt a once great US based Engineered Rep force. But we are fighting back and winning some small battles lately. ONE EU board member is starting to get it and helping us. They still call us cowboys, not kidding.
They’re finally admitting we’re in a recession. When it hits full depression there’s no way they’re going to move 50 to 100k metal. A total collapse of the auto industry seems inevitable.
Yep,,, and another Mexican import (El Lobo) won’t help.
They (corpgov) and their corporate hacks have screwed the pooch. Those in gov have no clue on the proper operation of an economy. Americans are not paying attention and many are about to get some old lessons re-learned hard and good.
Ford has been howling at the moon, the Lightning struck hard and the damage was done. Crying ‘wolf’ doesn’t help much, if at all. Admit the mistake and move one. A plate of Crow and some humble pie for dessert. Dollops of it.
Bring back the Falcon. Bring back Ford Galaxie and the Fairlane.
Come on, Ford, you can do it.
You do see Mavericks in decent numbers, and Broncos.
Might as well have a Lobo in the mix.
I’d get myself a Great Pyrenees, those Canis lupus can be a problem.
It would look so nice as a single cab “mini” truck but that’s never going to happen. Four door cab with a little dingy bed sticking out the back will always look goofy to me.
Wouldn’t that be nice? The last truck I owned was an S10, 8ft bed, manual, single cab bench seat. I should have kept it. That sort of utility is never, ever coming back.
Lobo, thought that’s what Ford called the Mexican version of the F-150. Lobo, wolf in Spanish.
Me and you and a truck named Boo
Travelling and living off the land
Me and you and a truck named Boo
How I love being a free man
— Lobo, Me and You and a Dog Named Boo (1971)
Eh, what the hell am I on about? The days of rock groups singing about being a ‘free man’ are as antique as Columbus meeting with the frickin’ Tainos. 🙁
https://muskratmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/columbus.jpg
I hear you. The AZ registration renewal on my pickup is 835 bucks (including the personalized plate). So I’m paying 70 bucks a month rent to the state. Nuts. Luckily the dang thing is paid off. BTW- That guy “Lobo” was pretty good.
OMG!!! This is the definition of insanity. $800+ for a registration?
How about a real body-on-frame truck the size of a Maverick for about $20k instead of a reskinned Mondeo/Fusion?
Was going to say the same. Lobo sounds like it will be a good high-end model for suburban dwellers. But seemingly, no car maker ever focuses anymore on ‘simpler, lighter, more basic’ — such as a 5-speed manual instead of an 8-speed automatic.
A certain percentage of many-geared automatics will fail. Whereas manual transmissions are essentially immortal: never had one break.
Can’t resist toying with Eric’s memorable quip: ‘Lightning Jim Farley has bled. Like Jon Voight did, when the inbred cracker tried out his knife on him.’
Hi Jim,
Agreed! Part of the reason why I am a fan of the Maverick is that the base price is under $24k. I’d like it even more if it were $14k – and I think that could be done because it is being done (viz, the just-launched Toyota HiLux Champ). It’s just not being done here.
2011 was a bad year for Ford. It was the last year of both the Crown Vic and the real Ranger.
Sounds like a modern day version of the 1991 GMC Syclone. Affordable and practical. Now if you could only find one to make a back to back comparison.