C02 “Plumes” and Contrails….

Lab tests of snow from 2010:

‘Aluminum Snow: Lab Test Confirmed’

“The testimony revealed in this video is from a highly degreed former USFS government scientist”…

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-KJqf8MU-2U

In the video you can also see the name and address of the lab which did the testing.

It’s a short 7 minute video.

In 2014 in March at around 10:30 AM I was driving east on a four-lane highway, to my left in the sky was a bright light. It was stationary, remained in the same spot. I wondered what kind of celestial light source is that bright at an early mid-morning day. The sun is shining, hence the reflection in the stationary spot in the sky, you ask yourself what is up there.

I turned north on another paved road just to stop a half mile from the highway to exit the truck to see with no obstruction to the naked eye.

The bright light was right where it was, all of a sudden, the light started to move. It moved at a high rate of speed to the north northwest at a high altitude. The vehicle blended in with the blue sky, but you could still see the outline of the flying object. It was moving like a bat out of hell. Just like that, in less than 10 seconds, it disappeared into the stratosphere.

Zero exhaust, the vehicle looked like it had two structures to make the outline of what was there, then a structure joining the two. The back part of the craft was probably the propulsion system. Some serious hardware in action.

Obviously spotted what I was up to and where exactly my truck was.

I believe it to be a man-made spacecraft. Don’t need no Shuttle no more.

I wasn’t even drinking. Now I am.

There’s a meteorologist I listen to, Joe Bastardi on WeatherWorld.com who claims the atmosphere contains more water vapor due to the warming of the oceans caused by volcanic activity/geo thermal generated heat. This creates most notable warming of the atmosphere in the polar regions. The water vapor also increases contrail visibility and duration. I kind of think this is more plausible than adding things to jet fuel that could possibly impair or damage the turbines.

Bill Gates thinks CO2 is to high. He wants to roll CO2 back to pre-industrial levels of 280 ppm, CO2 is currently 415 ppm in the atmosphere.

Bill Gates is not a scientist, and neither is Al Gore, Greta Thunberg, or Leonardio DiCaprio. Climatology is a specialized science, isn’t it funny how the MSM NEVER interviews the actual people who understand climate when delivering their anti-CO2 propaganda?

https://i.imgur.com/mpMnRZh.png

The actors hired to sell you the climate agenda all believe CO2 controls the planet’s temperature. They have been misled, and they are wrong, never on this planet has CO2 ever determined the temperature. But that is a modern heresy.

What is the reality of CO2 on the planet right now? Well here is a chart that shows it:

https://sciencefiles.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/Historic-Co2-levels.png

Note that current CO2 levels are at geological lows, and in ice ages CO2 gets so low that it causes mass extinctions. The late Pleistocene megafauna extinctions could have been cause by very low CO2, in which trees stopped growing and plants died.

https://62e528761d0685343e1c-f3d1b99a743ffa4142d9d7f1978d9686.ssl.cf2.rackcdn.com/files/89469/area14mp/image-20150723-22852-9nmf7j.png

So if CO2 is dangerously low in recent glaciations, why all this alarm over CO2 right now, when CO2 is at bare recovery levels? Because the elites have an agenda to kill us off with climate alarmism, to end our civilization by claiming that we are threatening the planet, by CO2 emissions.

CO2 is at bare recovery levels, and we know that because just the last 100ppm rise of CO2 is causing a massive greening of the planet, which means that plants evolved in a much higher CO2 environment. So that means Bill Gates is wrong, CO2 levels should not go back to pre-industrial levels.

And temperatures are not too high. Scientists have studied ice cores and reconstructed the ice age cycles back hundreds of thousands of years, in this next chart you can see 4 previous interglacials in which the temps were higher than our current interglacial:

https://i1.wp.com/www.volcanocafe.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/VostokTemp0-420000-BP.gif?resize=700%2C336

As much as I loathe them, the insurance industry is second to none is assessing risk and probabilities. The fact that they continue to insure beachfront properties at affordable rates is quite revealing.

If climate change was going to sink all this stuff, they’d stop writing policies.

Do commercial aircraft routinely fly at an altitude so high it’s impossible to see them with the naked eye from the ground?

If so, why do they change their altitude to such a degree?
Is it more expensive in fuel costs to do so?

Why do some commercial aircraft fly so high they are barely visible, just a speck – while at the same time – other commercial aircraft fly so low you can almost make out the color on the sides?

Why is it that on one particular sky blue Thanksgiving week I saw only two or three commercial aircraft overhead – while on the weeks before and after – there’s 100’s of aircraft a day creating a grid in the sky?

Why was there such an absence of commercial aircraft on the busiest travel day of the year?

On a week without any severe storms within 1000 miles square, did they all adjust their altitude such that they all flew so high it was impossible to see them… just because?

I used to spend a great deal of time working outside & looking up. Something most people do not do, and as a result, I imagine most people don’t give the subject a single thought.

Clue, #600?
I wonder if anyone has seen other than 3-types of snowflakes on their jacket sleeves or their windshields this Winter?

Or, put another way, I have only seen 3-types of snowfall the last few years:

– Several sizes of round ‘snowflakes’ I call, pellets.
– Blobs of clumped snow.
– Two sizes of perfectly formed 6-pointed stars.

I have yet to see any other shapes of snowflakes.
How about you guys? Have you noticed differently?

‘Snowflakes All Fall In One of 35 Different Shapes’

“The 39 categories can be further broken down into 121 subtypes”…

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/snowflakes-all-fall-one-35-different-shapes-180953760/

I haven’t read all the comments yet, but maybe tomorrow. I love the comments; there are a lot of smart cookies who follow you, mr. eric peters. I did notice, scanning them, that very few people wish to address the elephant in the room, which is our government spraying us like bugs. I’ve been aware of this since my late teens, early twenties. Maybe 15 years. For a moment there, I was so desperate to get people to look up that I wore a gas mask on my way to college classes. Barium, aluminum, strontium, lithium, what’s not to love, right? Knowing basic facts like the spraying, it was not at all difficult for me to say no thanks to the government offering me something free to keep me healthy. Like 9/11, just knowing the basic truth of that event made the covid scare a breeze. The authorities lost their credibility an awful long time ago. With covid, I think they just jumped the shark, with many people.
Thanks for linking to “The Dimming”. I’ve never seen it, but from the first half hour in there are no lies detected.

http://www.stationgossip.com/2023/01/no-trains-no-planes-no-automobiles-and.html

“Democrats are rolling back their states to the 18th century

As the bans pile up, it doesn’t take long to realize that Democrat-run states are engaged in de-civilization rollbacks of modern advances. They are taking away the combustion engines, clean energy sources like natural gas and reliable water abundance. This is going to produce a two-tiered nation where:

BLUE states will be backwards, collapsed, crime-ridden hellholes with very little access to functioning power sources, transportation, heating, air conditioning, grocery foods or other basic necessities. With producers leaving, their economies will collapse into ruin, populated by welfare recipients, criminals, addicts and anyone too poor to afford a way to flee.

RED states will be advanced, modern and highly desirable, with abundant access to energy, vehicles, affordable gas, water, transportation, food and more. Economies will rapidly expand with the availability of energy and the importation of entrepreneurs and laborers who are fleeing collapsing blue states.”

Stop Copper! Stop Electricity!

Down with electricity!

Just too many electrons moving through the Electron Universe.

Whatever that is.

If all you see is climate change, you must be a warmist!

“But could an increase in the amount of carbon dioxide in the air warm the Earth dangerously?”

The approximately +50% increase of atmospheric CO2 since 1850 (280ppm estimated in 1850, to 420ppm measured in 2022) has OBVIOUSLY not harmed anyone.

Because of the logarithmic greenhouse effect of CO2, the next =50% increase of CO2, which would take 84 years at the current +2.5ppm per year (from the current 420 ppm to 630ppm, or +50%), would cause less warming than the prior +50% rise of CO2.

The warming from the prior +50% CO2 rise is unknown, but it was certainly harmless. I enjoyed the warming since the 1970s here in Michigan and want a lot more.

The current global climate is the best climate for humans, animals and C3 photosynthesis plants in the past 5,000 years, since the Holocene Climate Optimum period ended (that was from 5,000 to 9,000 years ago, and is believed to have been slightly warmer than in the past ten years, using local climate proxies).

We should be celebrating the current climate.
The best climate for humans and animals is during a mild warming trend in an interglacial period. That’s exactly where we are NOW. The ONLY climate problem today is those pesky leftists, HYSTERICAL over an imaginary CO2 boogeyman, and predicting climate doom (SINCE THE 1979 VHARNEY REPORT).

CO2 is the staff of life on our planet — not pollution!

“carbon dioxide has zero effect on air quality”
— More CO2 in the troposphere improves air quality for C3 photosynthesis plants — About 90% of 300,000 plant species, often used for human and animal food

“Maybe it is just water vapor.”
— Water vapor is a strong greenhouse gas, but it is not a direct cause of climate change. Atmospheric water vapor is a feedback to other causes of climate change that affect the temperature of the troposphere. A warmer troposphere holds more water vapor. The relationship is explained by the Clausius–Clapeyron relationship.
According to the Clausius-Clapeyron relationship, atmospheric water content increases by between 6% and 7% per +1 °C.:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clausius%E2%80%93Clapeyron_relation

Here in SE Michigan, for our DTE Energy, 58% of electricity comes from coal and 9% comes from natural gas, or a total of 67%.

In China, over 70% of electricity comes from coal, natural gas and biomass.

So electric cars in both places cause lots of CO2 emissions!

I liked the girl vaping video. Of course the gold standard on the topic belongs to Dr. Ted Noel a few years back. Just in case you missed it here’s a link to a shortened 3 min version:

https://rumble.com/veivol-dr.-ted-noel-mask-demo-shows-how-they-do-not-work..html

ATTENTION: global warming, CO2, bs pushers, your computer modelling is pure fraud, fiction, garbage…..lol

Deadly Globalist Scam: ‘Global Warming to Alternative Energy Sources, It’s All One Big Hoax’

the non-governmental International Panel on Climate Change publication that focuses on physical science. It’s nearly 1,000 pages long and has 1000s of peer-reviewed papers. “This one specifically shows that there’s no climate emergency. This is the kind of information that is actually being censored by government and by media,”

cobalt is mined by Chinese companies employing child labor in the Congo, breathing in radioactive dust in horrible working conditions. And then the cobalt is shipped to China, where again, with terrible environmental controls, 75% of Lithium batteries made in China come from Uyghur Muslim concentration camps. Slave labor for Green Energy….Uyghur slaves are also producing solar panels……………..

the batteries are manufactured for Western green virtue signalers.

Wind turbines kill birds and bats in huge numbers. With Ontario’s growth and wind turbines, some bat species will be entirely driven to extinction. In California, thousands of golden eagles have been killed at one wind farm alone. And they’re not very reliable, producing power only about 30 percent of the time.

anyone interested in the subject of climate change to visit a website called climatechangereconsidered.org . There, you will find information that supports the idea that fossil fuels have, in fact, been a good thing for society. Not only have they massively increased our standards of living – there can be no denying this from any side of the argument –

but they have also aided our protection of the environment by preventing the complete destruction of Britain’s forests, for example, once coal became the energy source for the country. He also recommends that readers watch documentary maker Michael Moore’s film Planet of the Humans. “People were quite shocked when he actually revealed the incredible damage that’s being caused by wind and solar power.”

On the subject of electric cars, Harris has plenty to say.

“If you feel that it is important to reduce carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases, then stay with your gas-powered car.” Ron Stein, a California engineer and the author of Clean Energy Exploitations, nominated for the Pulitzer Prize in 2022, has performed a lifecycle analysis to show how much greenhouse gas is produced when you mine the cobalt and the various materials that are needed in electric vehicles,

then ship them to China, then charge your car, then dispose of these highly toxic materials at the end of their life. “He found that the lifecycle analysis shows clearly that it increases greenhouse gases if you move over to electric vehicles.

This is just one of the many scams that are out there. They’re saying they’re saving the planet, while actually, they’re causing far more environmental damage,” says Harris.

“All of this doom and gloom, we hear from the city, there’s a climate emergency; where is it? Not here now? Do you know what it’s based on? It’s based on computer models.” That’s all it’s based on.

Climate scientists use computer models to forecast what they think the climate will be in 50 or 100 years. The climate scare is not based on what’s happening in the real world. So, what is it that’s driving the climate scare? “There are a lot of vested interests,” says Harris. “World government, they want to have massive profits for the wind and solar sector. They want to take away a lot of our freedoms.”

computer models are useless….

How good are the models at forecasting climate if we use what we already know? Pretty poor is the answer. “If we go 30 years into the past, and we plug in the conditions that we know existed, temperature, density, pressure, all that sort of thing, and we run computer models to the present, do we get today’s conditions?” Not so much.

They call it hindcasting, in contrast to forecasting. Hindcasting shows the temperature rise in the last 30 years should be three times higher than it actually is. “They’re off by 200 percent,” says Harris. “And yet, those are the models that are being used by the UN, by the climate activists by the governments,

https://rairfoundation.com/deadly-globalist-scam-global-warming-to-alternative-energy-sources-its-all-one-big-hoax-exclusive-interview/

There is something very subtle about ocean levels rising that the media, and Al Gore, get wrong. I happen to be quite versed in this area as I did a lot of work on mapping the ocean and analyzing bathymetric data.

During the ice age, glaciers that were kilometers thick, pressed the surface of the earth down, by kilometers. The northern hemisphere, and to a lesser degree the southern, got dimpled in, more deeply towards the poles. The surface of the earth is rebounding from this ice age depression. Imagine a ball of jello wobbling after you poke it. This is what’s happening with the earth, but on a much longer time scale, so slow that it’s difficult to notice in a single human life. This rebound from glaciation is called “glacial isostatic adjustment” – you can google it for some good results.

The end result is that the ocean basins are getting deeper, and this creates more room for water; the east coast is sinking, the great lakes area is rising, it’s complex. So, when you measure the water level on the east coast, for example, you have some sea level rise from the expansion of water as it warms (the ocean has definitely been warming), you get some sea level rise from the land sinking, and you get some sea level falling from increasing ocean basin depth. Depending on where you measure, you will see different rates of rise (or fall). On net, though, these things have been largely canceling out in the US, so tidal gauges in the US will show very little rise. (and some places have seen lots of sea level rise).

When scientists discuss warming induced sea level rise, they need a baseline against which to compare. So, if they know an area is sinking, they will reduce its measured sea level rise, and vice versa – they “normalize” for glacial isostatic adjustment and report that the “adjusted” sea level rise is 1cm or something. A tidal gauge would not show this rise. The media then goes and hyperventilates about the 1cm, without understanding what this value means. It’s a reference value meant for comparison over time, not the actual rise of the water.

The sea level also isn’t constant, it changes with the ocean currents, seasons, and global weather patterns. It rising in one place doesn’t mean it rises in another. If the entire north pole melts, the sea level will not rise a single millimeter, because the north polar ice is floating, so it can’t raise the water level. If the ice in antarctica ever melts, we will see massive sea level rise, because that ice is on land, and when it pours into the ocean, it will raise water levels.

I have been bicthin about this for years…When you look up in the sky and see a tic tac toe board ….That is not normal!! But I guess most sheep never look away from there screens.

A simple indicator that They are lying about CO2 is that they don’t focus at all on the real killer of our environment, which is industrial pollution. Poisonous air and water is a major issue, but nothing from Them.

You won’t care if it’s 2 degrees warmer if you can’t breathe clean air and drink clean water. I spend a lot of time in the mountains. That thick brown constant haze isn’t getting better.

Why don’t they talk about real pollution? Because it’s not profitable for the corporations running our governments. Captured markets and forced consumer participation is.

“Peak oil” is a scam of the highest order.
First of all, let’s get rid of the term “fossil fuels”.
Naturally-occurring hydrocarbons are “abiotic”.
Hydrocarbon products are constantly being created deep within the earth by yet-unknown processes well below the layers that contain fossils. Keep in mind that hydrocarbons migrate upward and pass through “fossil layers” picking up remnants of “fossil” material; hence, the present-day scientists’ stupid mistaken assumption that hydrocarbons are derived from “fossils”.
Oil interests are drilling wells at 5,000 feet, 10,000 feet, and 15,000 feet and deeper, and coming up with oil deposits well below the layers and levels where “fossils” were known to exist.
As Russia gained much expertise in deep-well drilling and coming up with oil deposits far deeper than that of the level of “fossils”, abiotic oil at extreme depths was actually a Russian “state secret” for a long time.
“Peak oil” and “fossil fuels” are discredited dishonest concepts that environmentalists and others are latching on to, in order to display their hatred of oil being a renewable resource as well as to push prices up.
Follow the money.
Naturally-occurring hydrocarbons have done more to advance civilization than any other influence. It is the discovery, creation and utilization of ENERGY that propels civilizations upward and onward.

Here is the one link to the CO2 math, a high school level discussion how man made C02 is only 0.117% of the total global warming effect:

https://www.serendipity.li/climate/hieb/greenhouse_data.html

share it, print it out, bookmark it

Worse. than chemtrails, or contrails is Make Sunsets. Read about them on ZH awhile back, sorry don’t have a link. A company with the primary purpose of, in their own words “PREVENTING CATASTROPHIC GLOBAL WARMING.”

Make Sunsets is a company backed by Boost VC and Pioneer fund, Dark pool spooky money with a deep state taint. The companies CEO is a real special person, Luke isman. A tribesman who for some reason uses a small letter in his last name.

This company has determined that the answer to a problem, that does not exist, (rising Co2 levels) is to release sulfur filled balloons into the atmosphere to ‘cool the planet.’ Then sell stupid people carbon credits for all the sulphur (poison) they put into the air. Of coarse the balloons are bio-degradable, so there is that.

Seems a long time ago I remember something about sulfur in the air being bad. Of course that was before it was good, and before we were at war with East Asia.

Perhaps some balloons with campaign cash changed hands in clown world?

Where is Big Media, and the EPA on this? I’m sure their answer would make for some huge LOLZ.

This conclusion is correct:

“Both are, however, a means toward essentially the same end. It is not sickness reduction or carbon dioxide reduction that is wanted. It is us reduction.”

Another conspiracy theory validated as fact. Isn’t it funny that conspiracy theorists are always right but always dismissed as kooks or as dangerous by the Left mind controllers?

———–

How did these ‘crazy’ conspiracy alarmists know what the agenda was? Because if you pay attention they tell us directly. Like the deagel report. Under the “countries” banner, now removed, deagel a defense analyst site, predicted the upcoming severe population declines and GDP, and average income.

https://deagel.com/country

you can no longer find the 2025 report, but screenshots survive:

https://duckduckgo.com/?t=ffab&q=deagel+report&iax=images&ia=images

A decade ago the deagel report became an internet thing, now it is well known, it predicted that by 2025 the USA population would be 99 million, but our population is currently 330 million. No one knew how it would happen, and then all of a sudden Fauci and Gates were in the headlines. Ahhh.

(I blogged heavily on this and made dozens of memes and seeded the world web, as part of my subversive strategy to warn the sheeple of earth.)

————–

And another thing that is all telling. The elites meet in secret, and this year at Davos, they have 5,000 heavily armed mercenaries to guard them. The press will NOT be going over their agenda.

Gee wilikers Batman, do you think they have good plans for us? Do you think that the elite who are literally plotting to kill us off would want body guards as they go over their final termination plans for us? Yes they would.

Putin would do the world a huge favor by taking them all out with one of his new Zircon nuclear tipped missiles.

Water sports enthusiasts should be water skiing on the MacKenzie River Delta sometime later today. Jet skiing the Arctic Ocean melted waters is next. Going to be there next week, fly in by helicopter. Heard it was 82 degrees and sunny up there. har

There is plenty of ordnance being exploded, plenty of smoke and fire, should keep some of the sun’s rays from reaching the earth.

Bill Gates should be thanking Putin for his efforts.

How can anybody be worried about global warming?

All kinds of explosives getting the job done to massacre Ukrainians and Russians and then some, got to be getting hotter closer to the fighting.

The Russians are not worried about global warming, been 60 below zero there in the middle of Siberia.

The Russian people are not happy with the US gov, that’s for sure.

The real “inconvient truth” is that the world is getting greener, not dying off. Plant leaf density is increasing. Plant life in arid regions is increasing because the structures used in photosynthesis don’t need as much exposure to air, which means less evaporation and moisture loss.

Not to mention the so-called lungs of the Earth, the tropical rainforest, is probably on net not really impacting climate change much. Think about it: If the rainforest were being converted to concrete Chinese style ghost cities, then yes, it might have an impact on CO2 in the air. But they’re largely being used for farming and grazing, which involve growing plants. So replace random plant life with human managed plant life. If anything I could see where there might be less CO2 in the farmed areas just due to managment of decay and less waste.

Besides, if you really think CO2 is a problem, why not find some fast growing plant, harvest it and then bury it in old coal mines? Maybe that’s how the coal got there in the first place…

Classic chem trailing I witnessed several years ago. Coming home on the scooter, about 10 miles west of Spokane, heading westbound 9:30 in the morning, bright blue cloudless summer morning. Then it started, one after another “contrails”, in a crisscross pattern. Told the wife, “you watch now, see how those jet trails aren’t disappearing? In about 40 minutes the sky will start to haze.” Sure enough that bright blue turned to a dull blue haze for the remainder of the day. Very apparent on a motorcycle riding across open landscape.

Daughter and wife’s best friend are believers, both their husbands (pilots) still don’t believe and adamantly deny it.

‘An example, Bill Gates has been a fan of Diet Coke for decades. He usually drinks 3-4 a day from what I have read.’ — Raider Girl

It’s a habit Bill picked up from his older-Democrat fellow billionaire Warren Buffett, who drinks fully-sugared Cherry Coke in similar quantities.

Unfortunately, bad diet hasn’t dispatched either of these human predators, probably because they infuse themselves with fresh blood from dead infants or aborted babies.

Odd how the EPA & the Gang Green types don’t say squat about talk from the Bill Gates of the world of “dimming the sun”, which would likely create its own problems, nor do they say anything about whatever government may be spraying in the skies. But they’ll go after gas powered vehicles and gas stoves, claiming “Climate emergency” or some bogus “study” to justify proposed bans. It appears the only REAL emergency we have is runaway authoritarianism and psychopaths who wish to perpetually control the masses. We’ve certainly seen that with the draconian COVID measures foisted on the masses over the past few years, and once government got a taste of “emergency powers”, they’ve become addicted to it.

‘they had to resort to … the force-feeding of cars that use electricity, instead.’ — eric

And now, thanks to the ludicrous shambles of the omnibus bill, push has come to shove:

‘Price cuts span across much of Tesla’s lineup and now allow buyers to take advantage of the $7,500 US government tax credit.

‘It lowered the cost of the cheapest Model Y by 20%, reducing the price by as much as $21,000 to $52,990, not including fees and taxes. That enables buyers to qualify for the tax incentive by putting the vehicle under a $55,000 cap.

‘Tesla cut 14% off the high-performance version of its Model 3, which now costs $53,990 before taxes, placing it in the price range so buyers can receive the tax benefit. Other high-end Tesla models were discounted as well.’ — ZH

https://tinyurl.com/y3ad6drz

So Big Gov effectively is dictating EeeVeeee prices. Uncle Joe (Biden, not Stalin) beams in delight.

The Five Year Plan is working, comrades. 🙂

The amount of globalization we’ve already experienced has put ever more socio/psychopaths in position to gain ever more power, over ever more people. What do you think will happen when the WEF gains that power? Keep in mind, socio/psychopaths are not in the least bit concerned with anyone’s welfare but their own. They will in fact sacrifice your wellbeing to that end. Up to and including your life. It’s not a question of what they WILL do, it’s a question of what they WON’T do. The latter being a far shorter list. In fact it’s a one liner. They won’t do anything that doesn’t enhance their own lives. If they decide that bug spraying the entire planet serves them, they won’t hesitate to do so.