Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: A tax increase by other means

  1. #1
    Vulture of The Western World Eric's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    The Land of The Edentulites
    Posts
    22,731

    A tax increase by other means

    Governments all over the country are looking for creative ways to increase their cashflow - without a formal tax raise. Instead of filching through everyone's pockets via a new sales tax or jacking up the real estate assessment - actions that generate outrage among the peasantry, especially as the economy implodes - pols have figured out that they can generate a tsunami of cash simply by imposing and then enforcing traffic laws virtually all of us routinely flout, such as "speeding."

    Of course, this is an old method - but the means are entirely modern. Instead of using one Enos Straight with a radar gun - an individualized process that only allows a single cop to issue one ticket at a time - a "Terminator" like grid of automated enforcement is being erected all across the country. In theory, it could catch every speeder every time.

    Huge sums are involved. For example, in the Washington, D.C. suburb of Chevy Chase, MD - a community of 2,000 people with a town budget of $4.6 million - photo enforcement has goosed ticket revenue from $8,000 a month to a quarter-million, according to Chevy Chase Village Manager Geoffrey Biddle.

    In Scottsdale, AZ - one of the earliest and most aggressive deployers of automated enforcement technology - the geet is close to $18 million annually.

    This is serious money - and at a time when overt tax increases have become politically unthinkable in most areas, camera money is a godsend for the local (and state) politicos.

    The genius of it, though, is not the money it brings in. It's the way the public's own good intentions are mercilessly used against it.

    Everyone's for "safe driving." And, ipso facto, every traffic law that's passed is naturally the very essence of "safety." Thus, anyone who complains is - just as ipso facto - obviously in favor "unsafe driving."

    But we all know this is not so. Few of us, for example, look at a friend/family member issued a ticket for speeding in the same way we look at someone who kited a check or boosted a stereo. Yet both are against the law. True, the former is typically just a civil offense whereas the latter involve criminal charges. Nonetheless, few of us consider a person who gets caught in a radar trap a moral defective. Most of us know, deep down, that such a person has done absolutely nothing wrong at all.

    Despite the "safety" hard sell, we know that when virtually everyone ignores or routinely violates a law, the law itself is probably not quite right. Just as most of us don't steal, rape or kill - or even shoplift - so few of us drive in a manner that is genuinely dangerous. We're neither homicidal - nor suicidal. The same common sense that keeps most of us from sticking our hands into a running blender or operating a circular saw without eye protection also keeps us behaving reasonably when behind the wheel.

    That means we drive at "reasonable and prudent" speeds - most of us, most of the time. Yes, there are exceptions (and it's these guys who need to be ticketed) but traffic surveys show, consistently, that most drivers (85 percent of us) drive within 5-10 mph of a "natural" speed on any given road. This "natural" speed is what's conversationally referred to as the "flow" of traffic; in traffic safety engineering circles, it's called the 85th percentile speed.

    This is the speed that is supposed to correspond to posted maximum speed limits - not in my opinion, but in the carefully calculated reasoning of traffic safety engineers. State and local governments are supposed to adhere to the 85th percentile rule (it is even mandated by law in some cases) yet in practice, posted limits are routinely set 5-10 mph below what they ought to be. What this dirty little trick does is transform the 85 percent of us who drive reasonably and prudently into "speeders" ripe for a piece of payin' paper - and a fat fine.

    If things weren't so corrupt - that is, set up specifically and deliberately to turn almost all of us into offenders every single time we get behind the wheel - only about 10-15 percent of the drivers out there (those who drive considerably faster than the 85th percentile speed) would ever have to worry about tickets, photo-enforced or not.

    Instead, it's all of us who are in the gunsights - or rather, the camera's sights.

    And, for the most part, it's become impossible to protest - let alone escape the fleecing. The PR organ grinds out its saccharine message of "safety, safety safety!" - with the full cooperation of the media, which dances around to the tune like monkeys at their master's feet. The reporters know it's BS. Even the cop who pulled you over knows it's BS (follow him a while and just see how rigorously he obeys the posted limit). The judges recite the same old mantra; we pretend to agree - if it means dodging the "points" that come with a ticket for "speeding."

    It's all a gigantic farce; always has been. But thanks to the efficiency of modern technology, it's become a lot more lucrative.

    The net's closing fast, too.

    It's still possible to at least try to slip through. One web site, www.photoenforced.com posts a continuously updated list of known photo-enforcement locations. But a public cowed into submission by its own support for anything with "safety" in the tag line - and a government ravenous for "revenue" - bodes for an unhappy future, indeed.

    We're gonna miss old Enos and his radar gun. The odds were much more even back then...




  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    1,783

    Re: A tax increase by other means

    This article has been posted up on the main site with pictures:




    http://www.ericpetersautos.com/home/...3&Itemid=10923

  3. #3
    Senior Member Kwozzie1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Sunshine Coast, QLD, Australia
    Posts
    2,072

    Re: A tax increase by other means

    Our Queensland political whores, as recommended to by the bureaucratic whores who brown nose therm have seen fit to install speed cameras on a straight stretch of road on the highway north of Brisbane......it is hardly a danger spot ....just a place to gather dollars.
    The lying bastards reckon there is a safety issue......yeah sure...only because they might lose their jobs because they are a wast of space and bludgers on all Queenslanders!
    Rex
    On the Sunshine Coast, in the Sunshine State Queensland (QLD), Australia

  4. #4
    srd275
    Guest

    Re: A tax increase by other means

    http://timesnews.typepad.com/news/20...new-speed.html

    Some are going to push not doubt about that.

    But at some point people are going to push back.

    The more people the scammeras victimize by micro mangaging the law, the more people will turn against them.

    Photo enforcement by nature is dependent upon a revenue stream, so whether the vendors lower grace periods, or trigger speeds (I think down under it is 2 to 3 mph in some places) this will never change. The vendors NEED VIOLATIONS. Not enough violations puts them out of business.

    So they have to micro manage the law, it is not about safety, it is about money. More and more people know it too!

    The poll above is one out of UK on the govt latest plan to use spec cameras ( speed averaging) nationwide. It is 85% against. This out of a nation that has had them for 15 years!

    They got a powder keg over there on them. At some point it is going to blow up in the vendors face.

    Don't believe me. Fair enough. But there are two public votes going on in Ohio this year as well as a referendum on taking the funds from the cities for congestion relief in WA. I expect to see more of these in the future.

    As the economy tightens, people are going to have less cash. They are going to be less tolerant of cameras especially if most of the tickets are for every technically foul in the book.

    Heck, the camera vendor in Scottsdale wants to use it to go after people who text, or eat food. (I imagine drinking a soda or smoking is next, don't laugh I am serious). http://camerafraud.com/ (about mid way down). Here is a link on smoking http://www.thenewspaper.com/news/21/2147.asp

    When it gets down to peoples food money, people are going to start pushing back.

Similar Threads

  1. iPad means the end of in-car DVD systems
    By chiph in forum Motor Mouth
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 04-26-2010, 05:43 PM
  2. Economic slow-down means more tickets
    By chiph in forum Fight Traffic Tickets/Driving Issues
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 01-31-2009, 07:09 AM
  3. Increase in 1st class stamps
    By ChevyMan in forum Motor Mouth
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 02-13-2008, 06:32 AM
  4. If you have the means....
    By Eric in forum Performance/Muscle Cars
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-27-2008, 02:45 PM
  5. If you have the means....
    By Eric in forum Automotive News
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-14-2008, 10:10 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •