Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: 1980 Corvette 305 "California"

  1. #1
    Vulture of The Western World Eric's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    The Land of The Edentulites
    Posts
    22,750

    1980 Corvette 305 "California"

    The early 1980s were as unkind to the ’Vette as they were to cars in general, but California residents got singled out for special abuse. In order to comply with the stricter-than-national emissions control laws in effect in that state, Chevrolet was forced to pull the 5.7 liter, 350 four-barrel V-8 used in 49-state ’Vettes and substitute the “mini small block” 5-liter 305 V-8. Also snatched away was the possibility of a four-speed manual transmission; the LG4 305 “California Corvette” came only with a three-speed turbo-hydramatic—and a bad case of what Abe Lincoln once called “the slows.”

    Since everywhere else in the country it was still possible to buy a four-speed, 350-powered Corvette with as much as 230 horsepower (if you chose the optional L-82 high-performance version of this engine), the 305/automatic California cars quickly became herpetic outcasts among the faithful, and they remain so to this day. The small V-8 made only 180horsepower—a little more than half the power of the 2004 Corvette’s standard 5.7 liter, 350-horsepower LS1 engine, and was smaller and less powerful than the less-prestigious 1980 Z28 Camaro’s 190-horsepower 350 V-8.

    Unusually lardy performance even by the dumbed-down standards of the early 1980s was the result of this engine swap—which rendered “America’s Sports Car” little better than a flashy-looking “disco machine” that could barely even do a burnout on dry pavement—and only returned 14 to 15 miles per gallon as the final insult.

    It was too much to take—even for the beaten down American enthusiast driver. Popular outcry resulted in a short, one-year-only run for the 305/automatic-only Corvette. The engine was discretely dropped in time for the 1981 model year, when the 350 V-8 was re-certified for use in California.

    The bad news was that as the new model year dawned, the 230-horsepower L-82 option was gone, and 190-horsepower was all there was, take it or leave it. But at least buyers—including those in California—could once again specify a four-speed manual transmission.

    Like the family “funny uncle,” the 1980 305 Corvettes are not much talked about by Corvette enthusiasts—and don’t usually get much more than a let’s-hope-no-one-notices footnote in Corvette histories. About the only place you do find references to these cars is in Corvette value guides, which strongly urge potential owners to steer clear and point out that this model is one of the very few Corvettes likely to never appreciate significantly in value.

  2. #2
    Senior Member Mase's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    840



  3. #3
    Senior Member Mase's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    840
    The 1980 Kalifornia Korvette is on TIME's list of the 50 worst cars.....

    http://www.time.com/time/specials/20...658545,00.html

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    335
    ( That would be 'discreetly', not 'discretely'. )

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Minneapolis
    Posts
    1,429
    In 67 and 68 I drove a lot of cars between Philly, and NYC. As a responsible 18 yr old, this was my summer, and off hours job.

    I drove Rolls, Bentley, Lambos, TR-6's and 8's, XKE's, Ferrari's, Lotus, etc.

    Most of these cars were really bad. Once you have driven them for 100+ miles and they have awful clutches, awful seats, you realize they are made for rich idiots.

    I had a friend that had a Vette (his father was a building contractor). The Vette was the heaviest, most sled like vehicle I've ever driven. A Mercede's 600D was better than that Vette.

  6. #6
    Vulture of The Western World Eric's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    The Land of The Edentulites
    Posts
    22,750
    Quote Originally Posted by dBrong View Post
    In 67 and 68 I drove a lot of cars between Philly, and NYC. As a responsible 18 yr old, this was my summer, and off hours job.

    I drove Rolls, Bentley, Lambos, TR-6's and 8's, XKE's, Ferrari's, Lotus, etc.

    Most of these cars were really bad. Once you have driven them for 100+ miles and they have awful clutches, awful seats, you realize they are made for rich idiots.

    I had a friend that had a Vette (his father was a building contractor). The Vette was the heaviest, most sled like vehicle I've ever driven. A Mercede's 600D was better than that Vette.
    The first Corvette I ever drove was a '77 that I was thinking (briefly) about buying back in the '80s. Until I drove the piece of shit. It was just awful. Not only was it slow, it actually handled not nearly as well as my (at the time) '78 Camaro. Add to this a horribly uncomfortable, poorly put together interior and squeaking (and I'm sure leaking) T-tops. A disaster.

    Pass!

Similar Threads

  1. "Custom" 1980 Trans-Am
    By chiph in forum Motor Mouth
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 03-14-2012, 09:19 PM
  2. National Felons League "heroes" and "role models"
    By Eric in forum Hate Pro Sports - and jocksniffers?
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-24-2010, 07:06 PM
  3. 2009 Corvette ZR1 "by the numbers"
    By Eric in forum Performance/Muscle Cars
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 06-21-2008, 07:51 AM
  4. ZR1 Corvette "certified" at 638 hp!
    By Eric in forum Performance/Muscle Cars
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 04-28-2008, 05:27 PM
  5. Special edition "427" Z06 Corvette
    By Eric in forum Performance/Muscle Cars
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-14-2008, 11:38 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •