Wall Street shysters eying Social Security

[Eric]

Our IRAs will be next...


By Paul Craig Roberts

Hank Paulson, the Gold Sachs bankster/U.S. Treasury Secretary, who deregulated the financial system, caused a world crisis that wrecked the prospects of foreign banks and governments, caused millions of Americans to lose retirement savings, homes, and jobs, and left taxpayers burdened with multi-trillions of dollars of new U.S. debt, is still not in jail. He is writing in the New York Times urging that the mess he caused be fixed by taking away from working Americans the Social Security and Medicare for which they have paid in earmarked taxes all their working lives.

Wall Street’s approach to the poor has always been to drive them deeper into the ground.

As there is no money to be made from the poor, Wall Street fleeces them by yanking away their entitlements. It has always been thus. During the Reagan administration, Wall Street decided to boost the values of its bond and stock portfolios by using Social Security revenues to lower budget deficits. Wall Street figured that lower deficits would mean lower interest rates and higher bond and stock prices.

Two Wall Street henchmen, Alan Greenspan and David Stockman, set up the Social Security raid in this way: The Carter administration had put Social Security in the black for the foreseeable future by establishing a schedule for future Social Security payroll tax increases. Greenspan and Stockman conspired to phase in the payroll tax increases earlier than were needed in order to gain surplus Social Security revenues that could be used to finance other government spending, thus reducing the budget deficit.

They sold it to President Reagan as "putting Social Security on a sound basis."

Along the way Americans were told that the surplus revenues were going into a special Social Security trust fund at the U.S. Treasury. But what is in the fund is Treasury IOUs for the spent revenues. When the "trust funds" are needed to pay Social Security benefits, the Treasury will have to sell more debt in order to redeem the IOUs.

Social Security was mugged again during the Clinton administration when the Boskin Commission jimmied the Consumer Price Index in order to reduce the inflation adjustments that Social Security recipients receive, thus diverting money from Social Security retirees to other uses.

We constantly hear from Wall Street gangsters and from Republicans and an occasional Democrat that Social Security and Medicare are a form of welfare that we can’t afford, an "unfunded liability." This is a lie. Social Security is funded with an earmarked tax. People pay for Social Security and Medicare all their working lives. It is a pay-as-you-go system in which the taxes paid by those working fund those who are retired.

Currently these systems are not in deficit. The problem is that government is using earmarked revenues for other purposes. Indeed, since the 1980s Social Security revenues have been used to fund general government. Today Social Security revenues are being used to fund trillion dollar bailouts for Wall Street and to fund the Bush/Obama wars of aggression against Muslims.

Having diverted Social Security revenues to war and Wall Street, Paulson says there is no alternative but to take the promised benefits away from those who have paid for them.

Republicans have extraordinary animosity toward the poor. In an effort to talk retirees out of their support systems, Republicans frequently describe Social Security as a Ponzi scheme and "unsustainable." They ought to know. The phony trust fund, that they set up to hide the fact that Wall Street and the Pentagon are running off with Social Security revenues, is a Ponzi scheme. Social Security itself has been with us since the 1930s and has yet to wreck our lives and budget. But it only took Hank Paulson’s derivative Ponzi scheme and its bailout a few years to inflict irreparable damage on our lives and budget.

Years ago with stagflation defeated and a rising stock market, I favored privatizing Social Security as a way of creating a funded retirement system and producing greater savings and larger incomes for retirees. At that time Wall Street was interested, not for my reasons, but in order to collect the fees from managing the funds.

Had Social Security been privatized, I doubt that Wall Street would have been permitted to deregulate the financial system. Too much would have been at stake.

After the latest crisis brought on by Wall Street’s dishonesty and greed, trusting Wall Street to manage anyone’s old age pension requires a leap of faith that no intelligent person can make.

Wall Street has got away with its raid on the public treasury. Now, pockets full, it wants to pay for the heist by curtailing Social Security and Medicare. Having deprived the working population of homes, jobs, and health care, Wall Street is now after the elderly’s old age security.

Social Security, formerly an untouchable "third rail of politics," is now "unsustainable," while the real unsustainables—a pre-1929 unregulated financial system and open-ended multi-trillion dollar Global War Against Terror—are the new untouchables.

This transformation signals the complete capture of American democracy by an oligarchy of special interests.

[swamprat]

Due to long term unemployment, I may have to cash out my $100k IRA that was supposed to fund my retirement. Of course, realistically any sane person knows that you can't retire on 100k, so an IRA or a 401k is more of an affectation.

I am going to talk to my tax accountant to see if I can get around the financial penalty aspect at least.

Even before this crap happened, being cast off like used chewing gum by my last employer, I was considering cashing out early for fear of further dollar depreciation. I would have used the money to almost buy a house outright...Now, I'm looking at the American dream destroyed.

You know, for all the taxes I have payed into this system, they shouldn't tax retirement money.

[Eric]

Due to long term unemployment, I may have to cash out my $100k IRA that was supposed to fund my retirement. Of course, realistically any sane person knows that you can't retire on 100k, so an IRA or a 401k is more of an affectation.

I am going to talk to my tax accountant to see if I can get around the financial penalty aspect at least.

Even before this crap happened, being cast off like used chewing gum by my last employer, I was considering cashing out early for fear of further dollar depreciation. I would have used the money to almost buy a house outright...Now, I'm looking at the American dream destroyed.

You know, for all the taxes I have payed into this system, they shouldn't tax retirement money.

We have 401Ks in about the same amount and I am thinking very seriously about cashing them out on the theory that 60 percent of 100 percent is better than 100 percent of 0.

I believe that either the government will confiscate our 401ks to fund its operations/deficit (promising some ludicrous payment scheme down the road in return, which would render us all dependents on Uncle Shithead) or hyperinflation will wipe out their value.

I am thinking it might be smart to grab what cash I still can and use to buy things with intrinsic value, such as land and equipment and supplies, etc.