Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Hot under the collar over HOT lanes

  1. #1
    Vulture of The Western World Eric's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    The Land of The Edentulites
    Posts
    22,719

    Hot under the collar over HOT lanes

    No one likes paying or the same thing twice.

    So what is it with these High Occupancy Toll (HOT) lanes that charge people for the privilege of being able to drive on roads and highways financed by motor fuels excise taxes?

    They're sprouting up all over the country. Or rather, the infrastructure for charging motorists to use existing roads is sprouting up all over the country. Roads that were built (and continue to be maintained) with money extracted from these same people via motor fuels taxes, which average about 40 cents per gallon (see here for details: http://www.api.org/statistics/fuelta...mary_pages.pdf).

    In my home state of Virginia, for example, the last governor (Tim Kaine) wanted to give what amounts to taxing authority to a private, for-profit company (Transurban of Austrailia) over a major portion of I-95/I-395 in Northern Virginia, near DC - for the next 80 years.

    Drivers would have to tithe to Transurban for the privilege of using these roads - roads that were built for public use and with funds derived from the motor fuels taxes that all drivers must pay, every time they fill up.

    Naturally, there's to be no reduction in the motor fuels tax, nor any rebate or credit given to drivers who pay the current taxes but don't elect to use the for-profit HOT lanes.

    A decent case can be made for privately financed and constructed toll roads that charge user fees. If, for example, a private company can gin up the capital from investors (not taxpayers) necessary to build a new road or highway - and restricts use of the finished road to drivers who pay to drive - fine. That's free market capitalism in action. It could also be a great deal for motorists. There would be less traffic - and possibly, the owners of the private toll road could set higher (or even no) speed limits, since the state would not be involved.

    But it's outrageous to take existing and publicly financed, public-access infrastructure and turn it into an ATM for a privately-held, for-proft vendor.

    How is this any different from granting, say, "Justice Enterprises, Inc." operating control of your local county courthouse - and giving it the power to hit you up for $5 every time you need to get a legal document filed or want to contest a traffic ticket?

    Oh, yeah - I forget. They already do charge us for contesting traffic tickets.

    And countless municipalities all around the country have turned over aspects of traffic enforcement to private, for-profit companies - taking a cut of the proceeds themselves, of course.

    That's bad enough. Big government teaming up with Big Business to make a profit off the enforcement of laws is quite literally the Mother of All Corruption.

    But these HOT lanes are even more depraved because there is no longer even a weak attempt at justification based on the punishing of wrongdoing, or at the very least, law-breaking. With a photo radar or red light camera ticket, the argument can be made that, hey, you broke the law - and thus, the fine.

    It's certainly obnoxious to know that part of the fine you get hit with ends up going to help finance braces for the teenaged kid of the CEO of the private company that runs the automated cash machines - but there's at least some comfort in knowing there's a connection, however tenuous, between your actions and the handing over of your hard-earned money.

    But HOT lanes?

    All you're guilty of is wanting to use the roads you already paid for without being dunned again for the privilege.

    An irony of the situation in Virginia is that it was a Democrat governor (Tim Kaine) who was pushing the HOT Lane Hustle. Isn't it supposed to be greedhead Republicans who want to privatize everything - and turn the entire clunky apparatus of government into a nationwide system for Making People Pay?

    Apparently, Democrat pols like Kaine are just as eager to dip their beaks.

    Keep it all in mind next time you stop for a fill-up.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    335
    On the other hand, you do save time
    Which in Miami, figures in the toll. The HOT fee is much higher during rush hour.
    I guess it has to be; if the toll was low, everyone would use the HOT lane, and it would be jammed, too, just like it was when it was 'free'.

  3. #3
    Staff
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    3,126
    I am not against tolls for new capacity, but if it was built and then converted into a toll lane, then its another story.

    The spineless, gutless aliens we have in congress don't have the guts to raise the gas tax to build more roads. I'm not so sure I want the gas tax increased anyway. Our interstate highway capacity has suffered decades of Democratic and Republican neglect.

    The first expressways built were toll roads. Maybe we shold look at that model to skirt all the bullshit and red tape coming from Washington DC.

  4. #4
    Vulture of The Western World Eric's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    The Land of The Edentulites
    Posts
    22,719
    Quote Originally Posted by swamprat View Post
    I am not against tolls for new capacity, but if it was built and then converted into a toll lane, then its another story.

    The spineless, gutless aliens we have in congress don't have the guts to raise the gas tax to build more roads. I'm not so sure I want the gas tax increased anyway. Our interstate highway capacity has suffered decades of Democratic and Republican neglect.

    The first expressways built were toll roads. Maybe we shold look at that model to skirt all the bullshit and red tape coming from Washington DC.
    I've got no problem with toll roads, either. In fact, I think they can be a good idea. Among other things, a privately owned toll road could set more reasonable speed limits, for instance.

    But these HOT lanes are (usually) just the privatization of existing public highways - making people pay to use roads that they have already been made to help finance via the motor fuels taxes they pay. That's not right, in my opinion.

    It's double taxation - or it's a system that gives one group (more affluent people) more access to a public accommodation. Like giving people who can afford to pay a fee a "fast" line at the DMV.

    Either way, it stinks sez me... .

Similar Threads

  1. Turnout lanes....
    By Eric in forum Fight Traffic Tickets/Driving Issues
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 12-04-2010, 03:03 PM
  2. Fast lanes for faster drivers?
    By Eric in forum Fight Traffic Tickets/Driving Issues
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 02-10-2010, 04:49 AM
  3. Blue collar cars - Wall Street prices
    By Eric in forum Classic Car Corner
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 02-09-2008, 01:35 PM
  4. Double Right Turn Lanes & Mindless Drones.
    By alphasubzero949 in forum Motor Mouth
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 08-04-2006, 11:49 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •