Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: "FReedom Fondles" - seriously

  1. #1
    Vulture of The Western World Eric's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    The Land of The Edentulites
    Posts
    22,910

    "FReedom Fondles" - seriously

    This column by Debra Saunders is revealing as to her level of flag-foisting, plastic-patriotism cluelessness. Her column is titled, “Not TSA Pat-Down, But Freedom Fondles.” You see, the TSA is fondling — sexually assaulting — you in the name of freedom. Always, for these folks, we measure our level of freedom by the lack of freedom handed down by the elites who make the rules. Make sense? And she says the resisters, like Ron Paul, are “whiners.” What’s the matter Debra? Don’t want any critical thinking to get in the way of your need to get from here to there, unencumbered by time-consuming protest and dissent? Submitting is the easy route, isn’t it?
    For these state-worshipping, conservative-right, pro-totalitarian tools, the massive and aggressive security state is a sign of freedom — the state is protecting folks from all the various bogeyman who could potentially “harm” us all. She says:



    Not TSA Pat-Downs, but Freedom Fondles

    The latest controversy over Transportation Security Administration body scans and enhanced body pat-downs leaves no doubt: America truly is a nation of whiners.

    A CBS News poll found that 81 percent of Americans support full-body airport scanning. That reasonable view is being drowned out by elements on the left and the right who love nothing better than to proclaim that they are victims.

    First exhibit: Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas, who introduced the "American Traveler Dignity Act" to "protect Americans from physical and emotional abuse." Abuse? Have Americans become such babies that a pat-down designed to prevent another 9/11 causes adults to melt down?

    Yes, I've been through body scans. Yes, I've been patted down, not just at airports, but also covering political events. Yes, I've had to contend with the rare overbearing TSA worker who let the power go to his head. Are these searches intrusive? Sure, but they beat crossing the country in a covered wagon.

    I won't say that the TSA agents have handled every passenger deftly. A Michigan cancer survivor was humiliated after his urostomy bag leaked during a search. As the 15-seconds.com blog noted, the TSA's most lamentable error was failing to do the simplest thing: "apologize."

    Blogger Brian Sodergren has called on airline passengers to participate in a "National Opt Out Day" on the Wednesday before Thanksgiving. "We have a right to privacy and buying a plane ticket should not mean that we're guilty until proven innocent," Sodergren wrote.

    In protest, he suggests that passengers who are asked to go through a body scanner instead "opt out" — which means they submit to a body-pat.


    That's right, the body-pat Paul describes as "abuse." Sodergren even advises passengers to have their privacy-violating pat-down in public.
    Sodergren contends "there is no intent or desire to delay passengers," but he must know that if more passengers opt for longer security checks during one of the year's heaviest travel days, delays are inevitable.

    Some on the right argue that if the TSA engaged in profiling, agents would not have to bother granny and the kids. Now, I support directing security personnel to consider profiling information — such as countries visited — when screening passengers. But I disagree with Ann Coulter, who wrote, "In a lucky stroke, all the terrorists are swarthy, foreign-born Muslim males."

    In 1986, a pregnant young Irish woman named Anne Marie Murphy was planning on flying to Israel to meet her fiance's parents. Little did she know the fiance had hidden plastic explosives in her suitcase. Israeli security stopped what would have been a horrific terrorist attack because they did not rely on the profile alone. Female suicide bombers have struck in the Middle East and Moscow. The Taliban have bought children to train them as suicide bombers. Then there's Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVeigh.

    The conservative RedState blog likened TSA searches to "sexual assault, humiliation, and pedophilia." In the wake of the whining, the Obama administration has said it is looking at changing airport security.

    Even to prevent another attack like the thwarted Christmas day bombing, nobody wants to appear to be insensitive. Cable TV is ruining this country.

  2. #2
    Staff
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    3,126
    I hope that bitch gets gang raped by about 10 TSA thugs on their day off.

  3. #3
    Vulture of The Western World Eric's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    The Land of The Edentulites
    Posts
    22,910
    Quote Originally Posted by swamprat View Post
    I hope that bitch gets gang raped by about 10 TSA thugs on their day off.
    Me too.

    She's a typical Republican: Worships authority, trusts it implicitly. "They're protecting us" - be it cops running radar or TSA cretins fondling your junk. If you criticize or object, you're not a good member of the Volksgemienschaft.

    The same mentality that Sieg Heiled the Fuhrer... and will again, someday soon.

    Have you noticed that the left and right both share the same authoritarian mindset?

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Raleigh NC, USA
    Posts
    3,628
    Are these searches intrusive? Sure, but they beat crossing the country in a covered wagon.
    Uhh, people flew safely for decades before the TSA came into existence.

    If you look at the number of airliner crashes in the 1960's through today (all causes, including terrorism) I would hazard a guess that you're still safer today.

    Chip H.

  5. #5
    Staff
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    3,126
    Quote Originally Posted by chiph View Post
    Uhh, people flew safely for decades before the TSA came into existence.

    If you look at the number of airliner crashes in the 1960's through today (all causes, including terrorism) I would hazard a guess that you're still safer today.

    Chip H.
    That's for sure in that, outside the TSA, there have been nearly 0 terrorist incidents since 2001.

    The only terrorists are the TSA. They terrorize people on a daily basis.

Similar Threads

  1. The true cost of "fightin' for Freedom" in EyeRack
    By Eric in forum Tea Party Talk...
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-03-2010, 08:19 AM
  2. More truth about another "fight fer freedom"
    By Eric in forum Tea Party Talk...
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-09-2010, 09:38 AM
  3. They don't hate us "for our freedom" -
    By Eric in forum Motor Mouth
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-02-2010, 08:24 AM
  4. Bush's "freedom" bullshit
    By Eric in forum Secession Talk
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-29-2009, 04:39 PM
  5. More on "freedom" for Gail
    By Eric in forum Secession Talk
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-07-2008, 12:04 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •