Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: 2020 Mazda3

  1. #1
    Vulture of The Western World Eric's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    The Land of The Edentulites
    Posts
    22,817

    2020 Mazda3

    All-wheel-drive is a feature many people want - which accounts for the popularity of crossovers, which almost always offer it and sometimes even come standard with it.
    But for some reason, itís hard to find an entry-level compact sedan or hatchback that offers it.
    Well, it was.
    Mazda now offers the extra grip - and better handling - of all-wheel-drive with the new Mazda3, which gives it a leg up over rivals like the Toyota Corolla, Honda Civic and Kia Forte - which donít offer it at all.
    And over the Subaru Impreza, which does offer it - and for less - but with a lot less power.
    On the downside, there are some things the Mazda doesnít offer - like an optional engine or the option to choose a manual transmission, if you choose the sedan - options which several of its FWD-only rivals (and the AWD standard Impreza) do offer.
    As always, you pays your money and you takes your choices.
    What It Is
    The 3 is Mazdaís entry-level compact-sized sedan/hatchback sedan; itís in the same class as rivals like the Toyota Corolla, Kia Forte and Honda Civic.
    It differs from all of the above in being one of just two models in this price range thatís available with all-wheel-drive.
    The other one being the Subaru Impreza - which comes with it standard.
    Itís also one of the few new cars in this class that still comes with a conventional automatic transmission rather than a continuously variable (CVT) automatic transmission - which is the Imprezaís optional automatic.

    However, there is no longer a manual transmission option - unless you buy the more expensive hatchback - and then you canít opt for AWD.
    Prices start at $21,500 for the base trim sedan with front-wheel-drive and a 2.5 liter four cylinder engine paired with a six-speed automatic transmission.
    A top of the line Premium trim sedan with all-wheel-drive (and the same automatic) stickers for $27,900.
    The hatchback starts at $23,700 - $27,500 if you want to shift for yourself.
    Whatís New
    The 3 gets AWD as an option - and (unfortunately) a suite of standard "safety" features, including lane keep assist and a drowsy driver monitor.
    Whatís Good
    Itís one of just two cars in the class that offers AWD.
    Powerful standard engine - without a turbocharger.
    One of the few small sedans still offered with a conventional automatic transmission - with gears - rather than a continuously variable (CVT) automatic transmission.
    Whatís Not So Good
    AWD comes standard in the Impreza - for less ($18,695 to start).
    Sedan is automatic-only.
    Manual-equipped hatch is FWD-only.
    Under The Hood
    Regardless of trim or bodystyle, every 3 comes standard with the same engine - which was last yearís optional engine. Itís a 2.5 liter engine that makes 186 horsepower and 186 ft.-lbs. of torque.
    Without a turbo. And so, without any worry about ever having to replace one down the road, after the warranty expires.
    The Honda Civic's optional 1.5 liter engine - with a turbo (and a higher price) only makes 174 horsepower. The Toyota Corolla sedan's standard 1.8 liter engine hasn't got a turbo - but only gives you 139 horsepower. If you upgrade - and pay extra - you can get a new Corolla with a larger 2.0 liter engine - also sans turbo - and sans horsepower (169 hp) vs. the Mazda's standard engine.
    This is an example of the old saying that there's no replacement for displacement. And it's not just an old saying. It's an engineering truth. Smaller engines make less power unless they flow more air - which can be accomplished via force-feeding them air. By bolting on a turbo. This is a round-about way of getting equivalent power out of them vs. a larger engine without the turbo.
    But why not just go with the larger engine - and skip the turbo - as Mazda has?
    Because the government keeps demanding that new cars deliver higher gas mileage, which can be done by making the engines smaller. But then customers get an underpowered engine.
    Mazda splits the difference.
    The larger-engined, not-turbo'd 3's 26 city/35 highway isn't quite as high as the 1.8 liter Corolla's 30 city, 38 highway - but when you factor in the power disparity - 47 hp - it works out in the Mazda's favor. And while the much smaller turbocharged 1.5 liter engine that's available in the Civic delivers 32 city/42 highway, it only does so for $23,700 - which is $2,200 more than the base price of the Mazda.
    Which buys a lot of gas - to make up for it.
    But, there's no optional engine in the 3 - either way - which makes the 3 more expensive than the Subaru Impreza, which you can pick up for just $18,695 to start - with AWD standard. But the Soobie doesn't offer an optional engine - and comes standard with much less power.
    The hatchback version of the 3 also comes standard with the same 2.5 liter engine - and the option to go manual, if you prefer. However, the six-speed manual is optional - it adds to the carís price - and you canít pair it with AWD, which is only available with the six-speed automatic.
    If you buy the sedan version of the 3, you get a six-speed automatic transmission (with paddle shifters in Premium trims) and your choice of FWD or AWD.
    On The Road
    The 3 may not offer an optional engine but its standard engine is the strongest in the class, as noted above. And especially relative to its only AWD-equipped rival, the Subaru Impreza - which offers nothing larger than a 2.0 liter engine that manages just 152 horsepower.
    Subaru does offer the Impreza with a five-speed manual transmission, but the automatic-only Mazda is much quicker, posting a 0-60 time of about 8 seconds flat vs. about 11 seconds for the Impreza.
    With the manual six-speed, the 3 hatchback is even quicker, getting to 60 in about 7 seconds flat.
    Interestingly, the Mazda also has more ground clearance than the Soobie - 5.5 inches vs. 5.1. It's not a huge difference, obviously. But it does mean that when the flakes fall, it's the Mazda that might be the better tool.
    And when it's dry - it's no contest. The Mazda isn't just a little quicker; it's so much quicker you 'll need to pull over, park and wait for the Subaru to catch up coming out of every curve.
    There is also something to be said for not having AWD - and having power, without having to pay extra for it, as is the case with Corolla and Civic.
    And it's very nice to not have a CVT automatic.
    Just as Mazda is among the few car companies that has not bolted a turbo to practically every engine it sells, it is also one of the few car companies that isn't putting CVT automatics into everything it sells.
    CVTs today are much better, overall, than they were a few years ago - but many people do not like their operating characteristics. CVTs are, fundamentally, economy transmissions designed to maximize a car's fuel efficiency by optimizing leverage. The idea is to maintain the idea mechanical ratio between engine, transmission and driver wheels at all times - by eliminating fixed forward gears in favor of one continuously adjusting ratio.
    But eliminating shifts results in rubber-bandy acceleration feel and - often - more driveline noise. CVTs also seem to be not-as-tough (or as durable) as conventional automatics. In any event, if you don't want one, avoiding one isn't easy.
    Unless you shop Mazda.
    At The Curb
    Both the sedan and the hatch have interiors - as well as standard features - that would have qualified them both as entry-luxury cars as recently as five years ago. These include the iPad-like 8.8 inch LCD touchscreen in the center stack as well as the standard adaptive cruise control and the available Heads-Up Display (HUD), which projects information such as your current speed in a holographic display in your line of sight, so you don't have to take your eyes off the road to know how fast you're going.
    Another luxury-level amenity the 3 offers is an exceptionally high-fidelity 12 speaker Bose ultra-premium surround-sound audio system. It is the kind of audio system that you used to have to buy a luxury-badged (and luxury priced) car to get.
    But not anymore.
    And the standard audio system comes with eight speakers.
    Both versions of the 3 are good-looking versions, too. Neither looks entry level, at any rate. Mazda is one of the few companies that still views cars as more than transportation appliances.
    Style is still important here.
    As far as utility:
    The hatch has about twice the cargo space as the sedan - which has a 13.2 cubic foot trunk - but less rearward visibility due to the slope of the rear glass; the sedan also has better visibility on either side because it doesn't have the large "C" pillars that the hatch has.
    Like others in this class, there is a big difference in front vs. rear seat legroom. The driver and front seat passenger enjoy 42.3 inches of legroom - comparable to a full-size luxury car. But those in back get just 35.1 inches - unless those up front slide their seats forward a few inches.
    This is still par for the class, however.
    And style isn't optional in most of the 3's rivals.
    The Rest
    One thing - several things - the new 3 comes standard with that you may wish it didn't come standard with is a suite of saaaaaaaaaafety and driver "assistance" tech, including Lane Keep Assist, Automated Emergency Braking and a "drowsy driver" warning system.
    It's odd that Mazda would include these things - as opposed to offering them - as Mazda is a company that appeals to drivers - not cell phone tappers. Or mindless traffic law obeyers. One of the many annoying things about Lane Keep Assist is that it tries to keep you in your lane when you're trying to leave it, as when threading the needle through traffic. The system will exert countersteering force if you don't signal before every lane change - even when you're the only car on the road.
    Similarly, the automated emergency braking system will brake when there isn't an emergency - just another car ahead that gets within the "too close" orbit of the system's sensors. But "too close" is programmed in accordance with your glaucomic grandma's ideas of such things.
    Luckily, these things can be turned off. But you shouldn't have to buy them in the first place.
    The Bottom Line
    If you need AWD - and don't want to buy a crossover - or do without power - now you don't have to!
    . . .
    Got a question about cars, Libertarian politics - or anything else? Click on the "ask Eric" link and send 'em in!
    If you like what you've found here please consider supporting EPautos.
    We depend on you to keep the wheels turning!
    Our donate button is here.
    If you prefer not to use PayPal, our mailing address is:
    EPautos
    721 Hummingbird Lane SE
    Copper Hill, VA 24079





    PS: Get an EPautos magnet or sticker or coaster in return for a $20 or more one-time donation or a $10 or more monthly recurring donation. (Please be sure to tell us you want a magnet or sticker or coaster - and also, provide an address, so we know where to mail the thing!)
    My latest eBook is also available for your favorite price - free! Click here. If that fails, email me at EPeters952@yahoo.com and I will send you a copy directly!

  2. #2
    Senior Member grouch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    2,178
    5 days after buying my 2016 CX-5, it had to go back for some brake work. The dealer ended up keeping it for nearly a week. (It sat a long time on the lot and the rotors rusted and blistered) While they had it, they gave me a Mazda 3 like you just described. Inside it was as comfortable as my CX, but was so low, my elderly knees started howling. I was VERY impressed with the AWD system as we had a freezing rain event and I had to go around a jack knifed semi. I took it easy and it went up and over a rather steep hill and I got to work with no trouble. The nanny systems were really intrusive until I figured out how to turn them off. The controls are very different from earlier models like mine. When I tried to drive around a dead skunk, the car actually fought me. First a picture of hands on the steering wheel turned red, then a beeping, then a vibration in the steering column, then it tried to steer back, just as I was passing the skunk carcass.

    That 2.5 is the same engine I have in my CX-5. I'm happy with it both in economy and power. Steady driving at 60 on a state highway with no hills gave me 31 mpg. I usually get less than that due to my heavy foot. The AWD and 2.5 really will scoot. One thing that was improved over my '16 was the speedometer. You could set it to digital. My CX-5 doesn't do that and when you're going 60, the needle partially eclipses the numbers and at a glance, it looks like 50. In the past, when I've bought something expensive, I've often had buyers regret. Not once with this. A friend stopped by and was talking and mentioned he didn't know what it was, but he liked it.
    Honk if you love Jesus.

    Text if you want to meet him.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •