Nice!Originally Posted by mrblanche
I have to admit that Chevy and small block Ford V-8s really sound sweet.
This is one of our members doing his initial startup.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cITbECTLJh4
Nice!Originally Posted by mrblanche
I have to admit that Chevy and small block Ford V-8s really sound sweet.
I wouldn't want to be in something with that much power and those tires.
Sounds nice, music to my ears. Nothing like open headers. ;D
Try a sport bike sometime... the power to weight ratio can be even more aggressive!Originally Posted by misterdecibel
A T bucket is zippy, but nowhere near the power/weight ratio of a motorcycle. Almost any motorcycle.
If a motorcycle had bias ply whitewalls I wouldn't ride on it either. And the weight of a motorcycle is much less.Originally Posted by Eric
On a pound per square inch of contact patch, the T has more tire on the ground than the motorcycle.
I don't think that motorcycles and cars are directly comparable in that department, since they don't go around corners the same way. Cars can't lean. Especially a bucket T that has solid axles front and rear.
Do you seriously think that bucket T would stand a chance against, say, a 600CC road bike on a race track? (i.e. a road racing track, not an oval or a dragstrip...)
As far as handling, etc. of course not - you're right. But I thought you were concerned about "hooking up" all that power?Originally Posted by misterdecibel
Bikes also launch differently than cars do. With a modern liter-class sport bike, there is no way to launch with full throttle, or by "dumping trhe clutch." It is actually extremely difficult for all but expert riders to match the factory quoted 0-60 and 1/4 mile times - which are often in the range of 2.8 seconds and 9-10 seconds (respectively).
While a modern sport bike like my Kawasaki has a comparatively large tire (W speed rated; basically race compound rubber), the power to weight ratio when compared with most cars is much more extreme. In my case, it's appx. 141 horsepower carying a 450 pound machine; that's a ratio few cars - even ultra-exotics - come close to. And there are much more powerful liter-class bikes out there than mine. Both Kaw and Suzuki have models with 180-200 horsepower in a 500 pound package.... ;DOriginally Posted by misterdecibel
Assuming they had truly comparable power/weight ratios, I think the T bucket would do fine...up to the first curve. As you say, no car can turn with an equivalent bike.Originally Posted by misterdecibel
But my T, while zippy enough to scare some people, is not that much out of line with most modern cars. It weighs 2100 pounds and has 209 hp.
Well said! 0-60mph in particular is very tricky. And few people could get it consistently very quick on a lot of production bikes with road tires. When I was riding with bikes around 60 bhp or a little less at the rear wheel and weighing 400-500lbs I doubt we were under 5 sec. Or the mid-13s. Yet on a cold day the Norton factory got 11.8 sec.. with no mention tire brand or weightOriginally Posted by Eric
before marketing their 'new' 950cc twin.
Incidentally, I think that engine start sounded nice but I would have run it up to temp at a slightly faster engine speed. Although that's nit-picking.
I like the way the guy checked for front oil seal etc.
I have no idea how a car like that feels on poor troads with such weight on the fronts!
What about the Ariel Atom?Originally Posted by mrblanche
Chip H.
Even the Atom.